147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34571583)
1. Interim monitoring in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
Wu L; Wang J; Wahed AS
Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):368-380. PubMed ID: 34571583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interim monitoring of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials using partial information.
Manschot C; Laber E; Davidian M
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2881-2894. PubMed ID: 36896962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies.
Ogbagaber SB; Karp J; Wahed AS
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):840-58. PubMed ID: 26412033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptive randomization in a two-stage sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.
Wang J; Wu L; Wahed AS
Biostatistics; 2022 Oct; 23(4):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 34052847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian sample size calculations for comparing two strategies in SMART studies.
Turchetta A; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA; Lambert SD
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2489-2502. PubMed ID: 36511434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size calculation based on precision for pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART).
Yan X; Ghosh P; Chakraborty B
Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):247-271. PubMed ID: 32529788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical Considerations and Software for Designing Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) with a Survival Final Endpoint.
Kravets S; Ruppert AS; Jacobson SB; Le-Rademacher JG; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 37434437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power analysis in a SMART design: sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime.
Artman WJ; Nahum-Shani I; Wu T; Mckay JR; Ertefaie A
Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):432-448. PubMed ID: 30380020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): a practical example of automating double randomization.
Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):162. PubMed ID: 37415099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy.
Almirall D; Compton SN; Gunlicks-Stoessel M; Duan N; Murphy SA
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1887-902. PubMed ID: 22438190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): A practical example of automating double randomization.
Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X; Lee JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations.
NeCamp T; Kilbourne A; Almirall D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1572-1589. PubMed ID: 28627310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Get SMART - Understanding Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.
Kim HM
NEJM Evid; 2023 Apr; 2(4):EVIDe2300031. PubMed ID: 38320015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian set of best dynamic treatment regimes: Construction and sample size calculation for SMARTs with binary outcomes.
Artman WJ; Johnson BA; Lynch KG; McKay JR; Ertefaie A
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1688-1708. PubMed ID: 35124836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and Analysis Considerations for Comparing Dynamic Treatment Regimens with Binary Outcomes from Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.
Kidwell KM; Seewald NJ; Tran Q; Kasari C; Almirall D
J Appl Stat; 2018; 45():1628-1651. PubMed ID: 30555200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A flexible futility monitoring method with time-varying conditional power boundary.
Ying Zhang ; Clarke WR
Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 20423927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A gate-keeping test for selecting adaptive interventions under general designs of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
Zhong X; Cheng B; Qian M; Cheung YK
Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 85():105830. PubMed ID: 31470107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome.
Seewald NJ; Kidwell KM; Nahum-Shani I; Wu T; McKay JR; Almirall D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1891-1912. PubMed ID: 31571526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).
Ghosh P; Nahum-Shani I; Spring B; Chakraborty B
Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):182-205. PubMed ID: 31497981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
