108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34572942)
1.
Ko JMY; Lam SY; Ning L; Chai AWY; Lei LC; Choi SSA; Wong CWY; Lung ML
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 34572942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BRCA2 loss-of-function germline mutations are associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk in Chinese.
Ko JM; Ning L; Zhao XK; Chai AWY; Lei LC; Choi SSA; Tao L; Law S; Kwong A; Lee NP; Chan KT; Lo A; Song X; Chen PN; Chang YL; Wang LD; Lung ML
Int J Cancer; 2020 Feb; 146(4):1042-1051. PubMed ID: 31396961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Candidate susceptibility variants for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Donner I; Katainen R; Tanskanen T; Kaasinen E; Aavikko M; Ovaska K; Artama M; Pukkala E; Aaltonen LA
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2017 Jun; 56(6):453-459. PubMed ID: 28165652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional Analysis of the Bacteriophage T4 Rad50 Homolog (gp46) Coiled-coil Domain.
Barfoot T; Herdendorf TJ; Behning BR; Stohr BA; Gao Y; Kreuzer KN; Nelson SW
J Biol Chem; 2015 Sep; 290(39):23905-15. PubMed ID: 26242734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimerization of the Rad50 protein is independent of the conserved hook domain.
Cahill D; Carney JP
Mutagenesis; 2007 Jul; 22(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 17426050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeting Rad50 sensitizes human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to radiotherapy.
Chang L; Huang J; Wang K; Li J; Yan R; Zhu L; Ye J; Wu X; Zhuang S; Li D; Zhang G
BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():190. PubMed ID: 26951044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthetic Lethality with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Ohashi S; Kikuchi O; Nakai Y; Ida T; Saito T; Kondo Y; Yamamoto Y; Mitani Y; Nguyen Vu TH; Fukuyama K; Tsukihara H; Suzuki N; Muto M
Mol Cancer Ther; 2020 Jun; 19(6):1363-1372. PubMed ID: 32371587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Insights from next-generation sequencing.
Sasaki Y; Tamura M; Koyama R; Nakagaki T; Adachi Y; Tokino T
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 22(7):2284-93. PubMed ID: 26900290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel candidate genes may be possible predisposing factors revealed by whole exome sequencing in familial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Forouzanfar N; Baranova A; Milanizadeh S; Heravi-Moussavi A; Jebelli A; Abbaszadegan MR
Tumour Biol; 2017 May; 39(5):1010428317699115. PubMed ID: 28459198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Familial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with damaging rare/germline mutations in KCNJ12/KCNJ18 and GPRIN2 genes.
Khalilipour N; Baranova A; Jebelli A; Heravi-Moussavi A; Bruskin S; Abbaszadegan MR
Cancer Genet; 2018 Feb; 221():46-52. PubMed ID: 29405996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of RAD50 in familial breast cancer predisposition.
Tommiska J; Seal S; Renwick A; Barfoot R; Baskcomb L; Jayatilake H; Bartkova J; Tallila J; Kaare M; Tamminen A; Heikkilä P; Evans DG; Eccles D; Aittomäki K; Blomqvist C; Bartek J; Stratton MR; Nevanlinna H; Rahman N
Int J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 118(11):2911-6. PubMed ID: 16385572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Rad50 hook domain is a critical determinant of Mre11 complex functions.
Wiltzius JJ; Hohl M; Fleming JC; Petrini JH
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2005 May; 12(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 15852023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Review of Genetic Factors in the Etiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in African Populations.
Simba H; Kuivaniemi H; Lutje V; Tromp G; Sewram V
Front Genet; 2019; 10():642. PubMed ID: 31428123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rad50 zinc hook functions as a constitutive dimerization module interchangeable with SMC hinge.
Tatebe H; Lim CT; Konno H; Shiozaki K; Shinohara A; Uchihashi T; Furukohri A
Nat Commun; 2020 Jan; 11(1):370. PubMed ID: 31953386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of pathogenic germline mutation in CHEK2, PALB2, MRE11, and RAD50 in patients at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.
Kim H; Cho DY; Choi DH; Oh M; Shin I; Park W; Huh SJ; Nam SJ; Lee JE; Kim SW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jan; 161(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27783279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential Cumulative Risk of Genetic Polymorphisms in Familial and Nonfamilial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Suo C; Qing T; Liu Z; Yang X; Yuan Z; Yang YJ; Fan M; Zhang T; Lu M; Jin L; Chen X; Ye W
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Dec; 28(12):2014-2021. PubMed ID: 31562207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eukaryotic Rad50 functions as a rod-shaped dimer.
Park YB; Hohl M; Padjasek M; Jeong E; Jin KS; Krężel A; Petrini JH; Cho Y
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):248-257. PubMed ID: 28134932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RAD50 and NBS1 are not likely to be susceptibility genes in Chinese non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast cancer.
He M; Di GH; Cao AY; Hu Z; Jin W; Shen ZZ; Shao ZM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 May; 133(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 21811815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of germ line BRCA2 sequence alterations to risk of familial esophageal cancer in a high-risk area of India.
Kaushal M; Chattopadhyay I; Phukan R; Purkayastha J; Mahanta J; Kapur S; Saxena S
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Jan; 23(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19473207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interdependence of the rad50 hook and globular domain functions.
Hohl M; Kochańczyk T; Tous C; Aguilera A; Krężel A; Petrini JH
Mol Cell; 2015 Feb; 57(3):479-91. PubMed ID: 25601756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
