These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34573728)

  • 1. Sending or Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Flawed and Leaky Sources.
    Lu YF; Wang Y; Jiang MS; Zhang XX; Liu F; Li HW; Zhou C; Tang SB; Wang JY; Bao WS
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Aug; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 34573728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Light Source Monitoring.
    Qiao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Y; Xu B; Guo H
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Security Analysis of Sending or Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Weak Randomness.
    Jiang XL; Wang Y; Lu YF; Li JJ; Zhou C; Bao WS
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Sep; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37420359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending.
    Jiang C; Yu ZW; Hu XL; Wang XB
    Natl Sci Rev; 2023 Apr; 10(4):nwac186. PubMed ID: 37089191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Passive Light Source Monitoring for Sending or Not Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Qian X; Zhang C; Yuan H; Zhou X; Li J; Wang Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Apr; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field Test of Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution through Sending-or-Not-Sending over 428 km.
    Liu H; Jiang C; Zhu HT; Zou M; Yu ZW; Hu XL; Xu H; Ma S; Han Z; Chen JP; Dai Y; Tang SB; Zhang W; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Hua Y; Hu H; Zhang H; Zhou F; Zhang Q; Wang XB; Chen TY; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Jun; 126(25):250502. PubMed ID: 34241519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prefixed-Threshold Real-Time Selection for Free-Space Sending-or-Not Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Yu Y; Xu R; Wang L; Mao Q; Zhao S
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice.
    Yu ZW; Hu XL; Jiang C; Xu H; Wang XB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3080. PubMed ID: 30816159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km.
    Chen JP; Zhang C; Liu Y; Jiang C; Zhang W; Hu XL; Guan JY; Yu ZW; Xu H; Lin J; Li MJ; Chen H; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Feb; 124(7):070501. PubMed ID: 32142314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental measurement-device-independent type quantum key distribution with flawed and correlated sources.
    Gu J; Cao XY; Fu Y; He ZW; Yin ZJ; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2022 Nov; 67(21):2167-2175. PubMed ID: 36545992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decoy-state phase-matching quantum key distribution with source errors.
    Yu Y; Wang L; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Opt Express; 2021 Jan; 29(2):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 33726422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with leaky sources.
    Wang W; Tamaki K; Curty M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1678. PubMed ID: 33462254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 1000 km Fiber Distance.
    Liu Y; Zhang WJ; Jiang C; Chen JP; Zhang C; Pan WX; Ma D; Dong H; Xiong JM; Zhang CJ; Li H; Wang RC; Wu J; Chen TY; You L; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 May; 130(21):210801. PubMed ID: 37295116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution based on generalized operator dominance condition.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Lu FY; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Huang W; Xu BJ; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Express; 2020 Jul; 28(15):22594-22605. PubMed ID: 32752517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid protocol for sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution.
    Xu H; Hu XL; Feng XL; Wang XB
    Opt Lett; 2020 Aug; 45(15):4120-4123. PubMed ID: 32735238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution through Sending or Not Sending.
    Liu Y; Yu ZW; Zhang W; Guan JY; Chen JP; Zhang C; Hu XL; Li H; Jiang C; Lin J; Chen TY; You L; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(10):100505. PubMed ID: 31573314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with a passive decoy state method.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Qin SJ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42261. PubMed ID: 28198808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Security of the Decoy-State BB84 Protocol with Imperfect State Preparation.
    Reutov A; Tayduganov A; Mayboroda V; Fat'yanov O
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37998248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.