239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34573955)
1. Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study.
Kato M; Chida K; Munehisa M; Sato T; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Zuguchi M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34573955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of novel X-ray protective eyewear in reducing the eye dose to interventional radiology physicians.
Endo M; Haga Y; Sota M; Tanaka A; Otomo K; Murabayashi Y; Abe M; Kaga Y; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Meguro T; Chida K
J Radiat Res; 2021 May; 62(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 33839782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a New Radiation Shield for the Face and Neck of IVR Physicians.
Sato T; Eguchi Y; Yamazaki C; Hino T; Saida T; Chida K
Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 36004878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.
Eder H
Rofo; 2023 Mar; 195(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 36796379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Study on the Use of Radiation-Protective Apron among Interventionists in Radiology.
Livingstone RS; Varghese A; Keshava SN
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2018; 8():34. PubMed ID: 30197825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evolution of radiation exposure to operator in diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures and reduction of radiation exposure to operator with protective device].
Iida H; Horii J; Chabatake M; Mizushima T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1713-22. PubMed ID: 15614223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eye Lens Radiation Dose to Nurses during Cardiac Interventional Radiology: An Initial Study.
Yamada A; Haga Y; Sota M; Abe M; Kaga Y; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Tada N; Zuguchi M; Chida K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 37761370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.
Mori H; Koshida K; Ishigamori O; Matsubara K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 24338033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of protective measures in reducing risk of radiation exposure in interventional pain management: a prospective evaluation.
Manchikanti L; Cash KA; Moss TL; Pampati V
Pain Physician; 2003 Jul; 6(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 16880876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel comprehensive radiation shielding system eliminates need for personal lead aprons in the catheterization laboratory.
Rabah M; Allen S; Abbas AE; Dixon S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jan; 101(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 36453459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing Patterns in the Performance of Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures and Adherence to Radiation Safety Practices in a U.S. Cohort of Radiologic Technologists.
Lim H; Linet MS; Van Dyke ME; Miller DL; Simon SL; Sigurdson AJ; Kitahara CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 27575031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials.
König AM; Verbe Zoum J; Fiebich M; Abissi PW; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jul; 164():110862. PubMed ID: 37209465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation?
Johansen S; Hauge IHR; Hogg P; England A; Lança L; Gunn C; Sanderud A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Jun; 49(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 32074039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of additional lead shielding in protecting the physician from radiation during cardiac interventional procedures.
Chida K; Morishima Y; Katahira Y; Chiba H; Zuguchi M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1632-7. PubMed ID: 16395238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
