These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34574020)

  • 1. Clinical Efficacy of Novel Patient-Covering Negative-Pressure Box for Shielding Virus Transmission during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Fujihara S; Kobara H; Nishiyama N; Tada N; Kozuka K; Matsui T; Chiyo T; Kobayashi N; Shi T; Yachida T; Uchida T; Nagatomi T; Oba H; Masaki T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34574020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does an Extraoral Suction Device Reduce Aerosol Generation and Prevent Droplet Exposure to the Examiner during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
    Fujihara S; Kobara H; Nishiyama N; Tada N; Goda Y; Kozuka K; Matsui T; Chiyo T; Kobayashi N; Yachida T; Masaki T
    J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 37048658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective study on the risk of transmission due to droplets and aerosols during an endoscopic procedure and the usefulness of extraoral suction devices.
    Sunakawa H; Yoda Y; Takahashi M; Arai K; Kano Y; Yamashita H; Aoyama N; Mitsui T; Inaba A; Takashima K; Nakajo K; Murano T; Kadota T; Shinmura K; Ikematsu H; Yano T
    Dig Endosc; 2023 Mar; 35(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36076318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amount of contamination on the face shield of endoscopists during upper endoscopy between patients in two positions: A randomized study.
    Pittayanon R; Faknak N; Ananchuensook P; Prasoppokakorn T; Plai-Dum S; Thummongkhol T; Paitoonpong L; Rerknimitr R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1913-1919. PubMed ID: 33506983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparison of aerosol exposures to endoscopy personnel performing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with and without head box: A randomized control trial.
    Chaikajornwat J; Pittayanon R; Ananchuensook P; Kongwibulwut M; Rerknimitr R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 36464891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of patients who experience a higher distress level to transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy than to transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Miyake K; Kusunoki M; Ueki N; Yamada A; Nagoya H; Kodaka Y; Shindo T; Kawagoe T; Gudis K; Futagami S; Tsukui T; Sakamoto C
    Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 23368664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
    Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function.
    Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 23731392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: a comparative study.
    Sorbi D; Gostout CJ; Henry J; Lindor KD
    Gastroenterology; 1999 Dec; 117(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 10579971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commercially available novel device to prevent the diffusion of droplets from subjects undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A pilot study with its prototype.
    Endo H; Koike T; Obara N; Hatta W; Masamune A
    DEN Open; 2022 Apr; 2(1):e36. PubMed ID: 35310698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of Endo barrier for prevention of COVID-19 infection enables upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with high patient satisfaction in private clinic.
    Imagawa A; Kobara H; Nishiyama N; Masaki T
    DEN Open; 2023 Apr; 3(1):e204. PubMed ID: 36605877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
    Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Garcia RT; Cello JP; Nguyen MH; Rogers SJ; Rodas A; Trinh HN; Stollman NH; Schlueck G; McQuaid KR
    Gastroenterology; 2003 Dec; 125(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 14724812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "First look" unsedated transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding? A prospective evaluation.
    Rivory J; Lépilliez V; Gincul R; Guillaud O; Vallin M; Bouffard Y; Sagnard P; Ponchon T; Dumortier J
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 38(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 24268304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
    Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
    Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension.
    de Franchis R; Eisen GM; Laine L; Fernandez-Urien I; Herrerias JM; Brown RD; Fisher L; Vargas HE; Vargo J; Thompson J; Eliakim R
    Hepatology; 2008 May; 47(5):1595-603. PubMed ID: 18435461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsedated transnasal EGD: an alternative approach to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for documenting Helicobacter pylori eradication.
    Saeian K; Townsend WF; Rochling FA; Bardan E; Dua K; Phadnis S; Dunn BE; Darnell K; Shaker R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):297-301. PubMed ID: 10049411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.