151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34574041)
1. Quantitative Image Quality Metrics of the Low-Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.
Abdi AJ; Mussmann BR; Mackenzie A; Gerke O; Klaerke B; Andersen PE
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34574041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.
Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Gerke O; Jørgensen GM; Bechsgaard TE; Jensen J; Olsen LB; Andersen PE
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS.
Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Klaerke B; Andersen PE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):252-265. PubMed ID: 30809672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective DQE (eDQE) for monoscopic and stereoscopic chest radiography imaging systems with the incorporation of anatomical noise.
Boyce SJ; Choudhury KR; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091916. PubMed ID: 24007167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of physical image quality of two hologic digital mammography systems that utilise linear and 2D anti-scatter grids.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Aug; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37473741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
Wood TJ; Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.
Boissonnat G; Morichau-Beauchant P; Reshef A; Villa C; Désauté P; Simon AC
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1162-1184. PubMed ID: 36069636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.
Samei E; Ranger NT; MacKenzie A; Honey ID; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):926-37. PubMed ID: 19011189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography.
Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.
Samei E; Ranger NT; MacKenzie A; Honey ID; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3806-17. PubMed ID: 19746814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research.
Hui SC; Pialasse JP; Wong JY; Lam TP; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Chu WC
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():46. PubMed ID: 28035336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective DQE (eDQE) and dose to optimize radiographic technical parameters: a survey of pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Korea.
Park HS; Kim YS; Park OS; Kim ST; Jeon CW; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2014 Apr; 119(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 24337757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between physical measurements and observer evaluations of image quality in digital chest radiography.
Yalcin A; Olgar T; Sancak T; Atac GK; Akyar S
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3935-3944. PubMed ID: 32427360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CHARACTERISING THE EOS SLOT-SCANNING SYSTEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY.
Clavel AH; Monnin P; Létang JM; Verdun FR; Darbon A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):319-24. PubMed ID: 26538617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Super-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee Using 2-Dimensional Turbo Spin Echo Imaging.
Van Dyck P; Smekens C; Vanhevel F; De Smet E; Roelant E; Sijbers J; Jeurissen B
Invest Radiol; 2020 Aug; 55(8):481-493. PubMed ID: 32404629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization.
Zbijewski W; De Jean P; Prakash P; Ding Y; Stayman JW; Packard N; Senn R; Yang D; Yorkston J; Machado A; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4700-13. PubMed ID: 21928644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
McKenna C; Wade R; Faria R; Yang H; Stirk L; Gummerson N; Sculpher M; Woolacott N
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(14):1-188. PubMed ID: 22449757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
