231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3457420)
21. Class actions against insurers OKd.
Fisher MJ
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Jul; 82(27):1, 11. PubMed ID: 10307740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Innovative new Florida laws affect dental practice, malpractice verdicts and tort reforms.
Gustafson T
J Am Coll Dent; 1987; 54(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3473118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. As society struggles with a fault-based malpractice system, responsible parties encourage tort reform-but only with input and support from the medical community.
Miller RJ
J Ark Med Soc; 1993 Jan; 89(8):397-8. PubMed ID: 8428850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Tort reform from an insurance perspective.
Levy WC
J Med Assoc Ga; 1986 Jul; 75(7):424-6. PubMed ID: 3734643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Physician leaders testify on tort reform.
Rhoads JE
Pa Med; 1996 Apr; 99(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 8935883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tort reform 2004. The MedChi perspective.
Schwartz JA
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):28-9. PubMed ID: 15227946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The battle for tort reform 2003.
Puro JS; Goley RB
N J Med; 2003 Dec; 100(12):13-22. PubMed ID: 14730740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical malpractice and tort reform. Issue brief.
Whitehead A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2009 Jan; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 19297702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Tort reform is essential to protect Texas' legal system.
Butler MC
Tex Med; 1990 May; 86(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2343423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Tort reform 2004. The alliance perspective.
Larsen SB; Warden K
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 15227947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Tort reform efforts seek to contain malpractice crisis.
Karzel S
Trustee; 1987 Dec; 40(12):20. PubMed ID: 10285144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Tort system abuses at the heart of crisis.
Horsch R
Mich Med; 1985 Jul; 84(7):380-1. PubMed ID: 4033461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legality of state limitations on medical malpractice tort damage awards.
Depperschmidt TO
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1992; 37(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 10120499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical liability: the perspective of the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company.
Fager DJ
N Y State J Med; 1986 Jul; 86(7):342-3. PubMed ID: 3462535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The real world of malpractice tort reform. Part I.
Ludlam J
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Nov; 23(11):321-7, 333, 351. PubMed ID: 10107477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dissuasion and no-fault].
Larocque F
Health Law J; 2001; 9():171-81. PubMed ID: 12141220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The fault with "no fault".
Voytek A
N C Med J; 1994 Jul; 55(7):262. PubMed ID: 7935864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Florida Legislature passes medical malpractice law.
Coleman FC
Pathologist; 1985 Sep; 39(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 10272897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Beyond tort reform.
Scarano VR
Tex Med; 1997 Sep; 93(9):59-65. PubMed ID: 9754397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of state tort reforms on physician malpractice payments.
Waters TM; Budetti PP; Claxton G; Lundy JP
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):500-9. PubMed ID: 17339679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
