BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34574420)

  • 1. Inequality-Reducing Effects of Tobacco Tax Increase: Accounting for Behavioral Response of Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Households in Serbia.
    Vladisavljević M; Zubović J; Đukić M; Jovanović O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.
    Önder Z; Yürekli AA
    Tob Control; 2016 Jan; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 25228361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.
    Choi SE
    Tob Control; 2016 Mar; 25(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 25430738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tobacco price elasticity in Serbia: evidence from a middle-income country with high prevalence and low tobacco prices.
    Vladisavljevic M; Zubović J; Đukić M; Jovanović O
    Tob Control; 2020 Nov; 29(Suppl 5):s331-s336. PubMed ID: 32848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Price and income elasticity of cigarette demand in Bosnia and Herzegovina by different socioeconomic groups.
    Gligorić D; Preradović Kulovac D; Mićić L; Pepić A
    Tob Control; 2022 Sep; 31(Suppl 2):s101-s109. PubMed ID: 35078908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demand for tobacco products in Bangladesh.
    Ahmed N; Mozumder TA; Hassan MT; Huque R
    Tob Control; 2022 Nov; 31(6):737-743. PubMed ID: 33811154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of a recent tobacco tax reform in Argentina.
    González-Rozada M
    Tob Control; 2020 Nov; 29(Suppl 5):s300-s303. PubMed ID: 32843501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential price responses for tobacco consumption: implications for tax incidence.
    Cruces G; Falcone G; Puig J
    Tob Control; 2022 Sep; 31(Suppl 2):s95-s100. PubMed ID: 35017265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quasi-experimental evidence on tobacco tax regressivity.
    Koch SF
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Jan; 196():19-28. PubMed ID: 29127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consequences of tobacco tax on household health and finances in rich and poor smokers in China: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Verguet S; Gauvreau CL; Mishra S; MacLennan M; Murphy SM; Brouwer ED; Nugent RA; Zhao K; Jha P; Jamison DT
    Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Apr; 3(4):e206-16. PubMed ID: 25772692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Questioning the regressivity of tobacco taxes: a distributional accounting impact model of increased tobacco taxation.
    Verguet S; Kearns PKA; Rees VW
    Tob Control; 2021 May; 30(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 32576701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tobacco taxes for improving welfare and distributional outcomes: the case of Georgia.
    Fuchs Tarlovsky A; González Icaza MF
    Eur J Public Health; 2021 Oct; 31(5):936-942. PubMed ID: 33734366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The heterogeneous impact of a successful tobacco control campaign: a case study of Mauritius.
    Ross H; Moussa L; Harris T; Ajodhea R
    Tob Control; 2018 Jan; 27(1):83-89. PubMed ID: 28302918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socio-economic status.
    Cizmovic M; Mugosa A; Kovacevic M; Lakovic T
    Tob Control; 2022 Sep; 31(Suppl 2):s124-s132. PubMed ID: 35279643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tobacco excise tax increase and illicit cigarette consumption: evidence from Vietnam.
    Nguyen A; Nguyen HT
    Tob Control; 2020 Oct; 29(Suppl 4):s275-s280. PubMed ID: 32041832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Price elasticity of demand for cigarettes in Bosnia and Herzegovina: microdata analysis.
    Gligorić D; Pepić A; Petković S; Ateljević J; Vukojević B
    Tob Control; 2020 Nov; 29(Suppl 5):s304-s309. PubMed ID: 32843503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fiscal policy, affordability and cross effects in the demand for tobacco products: the case of Uruguay].
    Carbajales AR; Curti D
    Salud Publica Mex; 2010; 52 Suppl 2():S186-96. PubMed ID: 21243189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Price elasticity of tobacco products among economic classes in India, 2011-2012.
    Selvaraj S; Srivastava S; Karan A
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008180. PubMed ID: 26656009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of cigarette demand in Argentina: the impact of price changes on consumption and government revenues.
    Rodríguez-Iglesias G; Schoj V; Chaloupka F; Champagne B; González-Rozada M
    Salud Publica Mex; 2017; 59(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28423115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The price sensitivity of cigarette consumption in Bangladesh: evidence from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh Wave 1 (2009) and Wave 2 (2010) Surveys.
    Nargis N; Ruthbah UH; Hussain AK; Fong GT; Huq I; Ashiquzzaman SM
    Tob Control; 2014 Mar; 23 Suppl 1(0 1):i39-47. PubMed ID: 24105828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.