210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34576338)
1. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Phosphorylated Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: A Force Field Comparison.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 34576338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.
Xue Y; Yuwen T; Zhu F; Skrynnikov NR
Biochemistry; 2014 Oct; 53(41):6473-95. PubMed ID: 25207671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins.
Huang J; Rauscher S; Nawrocki G; Ran T; Feig M; de Groot BL; Grubmüller H; MacKerell AD
Nat Methods; 2017 Jan; 14(1):71-73. PubMed ID: 27819658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Multisite Phosphorylation on the Conformational Properties of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 34681718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phosphorylation of a Disordered Peptide-Structural Effects and Force Field Inconsistencies.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1924-1935. PubMed ID: 32050065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Binding of Peptides and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Their Folded Targets: 2. The Model of Encounter Complex Involving the Double Mutant of the c-Crk N-SH3 Domain and Peptide Sos.
Yuwen T; Xue Y; Skrynnikov NR
Biochemistry; 2016 Mar; 55(12):1784-800. PubMed ID: 26910732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How multisite phosphorylation impacts the conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Jin F; Gräter F
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e1008939. PubMed ID: 33945530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Force Field Effects in Simulations of Flexible Peptides with Varying Polyproline II Propensity.
Jephthah S; Pesce F; Lindorff-Larsen K; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6634-6646. PubMed ID: 34524800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. General Purpose Water Model Can Improve Atomistic Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Shabane PS; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2620-2634. PubMed ID: 30865832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phosphorylation of an intrinsically disordered segment in Ets1 shifts conformational sampling toward binding-competent substates.
Bui JM; Gsponer J
Structure; 2014 Aug; 22(8):1196-1203. PubMed ID: 25017730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balanced Force Field ff03CMAP Improving the Dynamics Conformation Sampling of Phosphorylation Site.
Zhong B; Song G; Chen HF
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 36232586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell size effects in the molecular dynamics of the intrinsically disordered Aβ peptide.
Mehra R; Kepp KP
J Chem Phys; 2019 Aug; 151(8):085101. PubMed ID: 31470695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phosphorylation of an intrinsically disordered region of Ets1 shifts a multi-modal interaction ensemble to an auto-inhibitory state.
Kasahara K; Shiina M; Higo J; Ogata K; Nakamura H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Mar; 46(5):2243-2251. PubMed ID: 29309620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Higher Accuracy Achieved in the Simulations of Protein Structure Refinement, Protein Folding, and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using Polarizable Force Fields.
Wang A; Zhang Z; Li G
J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Dec; 9(24):7110-7116. PubMed ID: 30514082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phosphorylation Regulates the Bound Structure of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein: The p53-TAZ2 Case.
Ithuralde RE; Turjanski AG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144284. PubMed ID: 26742101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of electrostatic forces on the association kinetics and conformational ensemble of an intrinsically disordered protein.
Cook EC; Creamer TP
Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1607-1619. PubMed ID: 32654182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified Protein-Water Interactions in CHARMM36m for Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Proteins in Dilute and Crowded Solutions.
Matsubara D; Kasahara K; Dokainish HM; Oshima H; Sugita Y
Molecules; 2022 Sep; 27(17):. PubMed ID: 36080494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
