These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3457687)

  • 21. [Intrapulpal temperature change during the setting reactions of various dental cements].
    Ulusoy M; Denli N
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1990 Jan; 17(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 2104051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the clinical performance of a glass ionomer cement.
    Pameijer CH
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 80():1-117. PubMed ID: 1767366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Pulp tolerance of glass ionomer cement ( an animal experiment study)].
    Roulet JF; Rui J; Ritz B; Hotz P
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1980 Dec; 90(12):1116-26. PubMed ID: 6941467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The response of the human dental pulp to glass ionomer cements.
    Cooper IR
    Int Endod J; 1980 May; 13(2):76-88. PubMed ID: 6935175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Pulp toxicity of luting cements].
    Grund P; Raab WH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 2269096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD; Nelson SK; Cibirka R; Myers ML
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement in primates.
    Pameijer CH; Segal E; Richardson J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jul; 46(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 6944469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biocompatibility of a glass ionomer luting agent. 2. Crown cementation.
    Pameijer CH; Stanley HR; Ecker G
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 1863434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage through dentin after crown cementation.
    White SN; Furuichi R; Kyomen SM
    J Endod; 1995 Jan; 21(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 7714436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pulpal responses to ionomer cements--biological characteristics.
    Stanley HR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2404040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Belser UC; Scherrer SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tissue response to a glass ionomer used as an endodontic cement. A preliminary study in dogs.
    Zmener O; Dominguez FV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Aug; 56(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 6578483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The response of the rat molar pulp to a glass ionomer cement.
    Paterson RC; Watts A
    Br Dent J; 1981 Oct; 151(7):228-30. PubMed ID: 6946825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Antimicrobial activity of orthodontic band cements].
    Pavic J; Arriagada M; Elgueta J; García C
    Rev Fac Odontol Univ Chile; 1990; 8(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 2135908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.