These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34578941)
21. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay. Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Consumers' Trade-Off between Nutrition and Health Claims under Regulation 1924/2006: Insights from a Choice Experiment Analysis. Viscecchia R; Nocella G; De Devitiis B; Bimbo F; Carlucci D; Seccia A; Nardone G Nutrients; 2019 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31779205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing. Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Consumer Preferences for Cheese Products with Quality Labels: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté. Menozzi D; Yeh CH; Cozzi E; Arfini F Animals (Basel); 2022 May; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35625145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis. Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. University Students' Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay for Carbon-Labeled Food Products: A Purchase Decision-Making Experiment. Zhao R; Yang M; Liu J; Yang L; Bao Z; Ren X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 32992905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors Forming the Consumers' Willingness to Pay a Price Premium for Ecological Goods in Ukraine. Kucher A; Hełdak M; Kucher L; Raszka B Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30857268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measuring consumers' interest in instant fortified pearl millet products: a field experiment in Touba, Senegal. De Groote H; Kariuki SW; Traore D; Taylor JR; Ferruzzi MG; Hamaker BR J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Apr; 98(6):2320-2331. PubMed ID: 28990670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of extrinsic attributes on liking of cottage cheese. Hubbard EM; Jervis SM; Drake MA J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 26519972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review. Alsubhi M; Blake M; Nguyen T; Majmudar I; Moodie M; Ananthapavan J Obes Rev; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13525. PubMed ID: 36342169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay. Bozzo G; Barrasso R; Grimaldi CA; Tantillo G; Roma R Vet Ital; 2019 Dec; 55(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 31642310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries. Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking. Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Product reformulation in the context of nutritional warning labels: Exploration of consumer preferences towards food concepts in three food categories. Ares G; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Antúnez L; Machín L; Vidal L; Giménez A Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():669-674. PubMed ID: 29580533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consumers' attitudes of high-intensity ultrasound in Minas Frescal cheese processing: An innovative approach with text highlighting technique. Scudino H; Tavares-Filho ER; Guimarães JT; Mársico ET; Silva MC; Freitas MQ; Pimentel TC; Esmerino EA; Cruz AG Food Res Int; 2023 May; 167():112702. PubMed ID: 37087267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Organic milk preference: is it a matter of information? Scozzafava G; Gerini F; Boncinelli F; Contini C; Marone E; Casini L Appetite; 2020 Jan; 144():104477. PubMed ID: 31574269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consumer preferences for pig welfare - Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork? Denver S; Sandøe P; Christensen T Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():140-146. PubMed ID: 28284125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Aschemann-Witzel J; Jensen JH; Jensen MH; Kulikovskaja V Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():246-258. PubMed ID: 28487247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cheese liking and consumer willingness to pay as affected by information about organic production. Napolitano F; Braghieri A; Piasentier E; Favotto S; Naspetti S; Zanoli R J Dairy Res; 2010 Aug; 77(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 20196900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]