These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34579822)

  • 1. Missing participant outcome data in meta-analysis. Part 2.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):632-635. PubMed ID: 34579822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Missing participant outcome data in meta-analysis. Part I.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):481-483. PubMed ID: 34456008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Higgins JP; White IR; Wood AM
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 18559412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing continuous data measured with different instruments for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 24613497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Chaimani A; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 25009175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.
    Spineli LM
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):514-525. PubMed ID: 28961395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A proposed framework to guide evidence synthesis practice for meta-analysis with zero-events studies.
    Xu C; Furuya-Kanamori L; Zorzela L; Lin L; Vohra S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():70-78. PubMed ID: 33592277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A guidance was developed to identify participants with missing outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Guyatt GH; Agoritsas T; Briel M; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Khamis AM; Zhang Y; Hooft L; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():55-63. PubMed ID: 31299357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 23321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis Methodologies: Same Same or Different?
    Coscas R
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2024 Sep; 68(3):359-360. PubMed ID: 38944268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of diagnostic and prognostic modeling studies: guidance on their use.
    Debray TP; Riley RD; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG;
    PLoS Med; 2015 Oct; 12(10):e1001886. PubMed ID: 26461078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-post changes in main outcomes of medical rehabilitation in Germany: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data.
    Schuler M; Murauer K; Stangl S; Grau A; Gabriel K; Podger L; Heuschmann PU; Faller H
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(5):e023826. PubMed ID: 31154291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence.
    Guyatt GH; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Mathioudakis AG; Briel M; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Neumann I; Kahale LA; Iorio A; Meerpohl J; Schünemann HJ; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():14-22. PubMed ID: 28529188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.