These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34579822)

  • 21. How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis.
    Tierney JF; Pignon JP; Gueffyier F; Clarke M; Askie L; Vale CL; Burdett S;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1325-35. PubMed ID: 26186982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Arthroscopic meniscectomy versus non-surgical or sham treatment in patients with MRI confirmed degenerative meniscus lesions: a protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Wijn SRW; Rovers MM; Rongen JJ; Østerås H; Risberg MA; Roos EM; Hare KB; van de Graaf VA; Poolman RW; Englund M; Hannink G
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e031864. PubMed ID: 32152157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data on cord management at preterm birth (iCOMP): study protocol.
    Seidler AL; Duley L; Katheria AC; De Paco Matallana C; Dempsey E; Rabe H; Kattwinkel J; Mercer J; Josephsen J; Fairchild K; Andersson O; Hosono S; Sundaram V; Datta V; El-Naggar W; Tarnow-Mordi W; Debray T; Hooper SB; Kluckow M; Polglase G; Davis PG; Montgomery A; Hunter KE; Barba A; Simes J; Askie L;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034595. PubMed ID: 32229522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
    Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The differences between meta-analysis and meta-study: part I.
    Chamberlain B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2007; 21(5):229-30. PubMed ID: 17978621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reporting and Handling of Missing Participant Data in Systematic Reviews of Kidney Transplant Studies.
    Budhiraja P; Kalot MA; Alayli AE; Dimassi A; Kaplan B; Chakkera HA; Mustafa RA
    Transplantation; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1708-1717. PubMed ID: 33093406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How often can meta-analyses of individual-level data individualize treatment? A meta-epidemiologic study.
    Schuit E; Li AH; Ioannidis JPA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 30445577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An empirical comparison of meta-analysis and mega-analysis of individual participant data for identifying gene-environment interactions.
    Sung YJ; Schwander K; Arnett DK; Kardia SL; Rankinen T; Bouchard C; Boerwinkle E; Hunt SC; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 May; 38(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 24719363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.
    Turner NL; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2062-80. PubMed ID: 25809313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data.
    Burgess S; White IR; Resche-Rigon M; Wood AM
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4499-514. PubMed ID: 23703895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple imputation for handling systematically missing confounders in meta-analysis of individual participant data.
    Resche-Rigon M; White IR; Bartlett JW; Peters SA; Thompson SG;
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4890-905. PubMed ID: 23857554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.
    Friedman S
    J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):577-8; author reply 578-80. PubMed ID: 21496650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis. A useful tool for the spine researcher.
    Haselkorn JK; Turner JA; Diehr PK; Ciol MA; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Sep; 19(18 Suppl):2076S-2082S. PubMed ID: 7801186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE.
    Jolani S; Debray TP; Koffijberg H; van Buuren S; Moons KG
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(11):1841-63. PubMed ID: 25663182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overcoming obstacles in obtaining individual participant data for meta-analysis.
    Polanin JR; Williams RT
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 27228953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The differences between meta-analysis and meta-study: Part II.
    Chamberlain B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2007; 21(6):272-3. PubMed ID: 18000437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of repeated measurements with dropouts among Alzheimer's disease patients using summary measures and meta-analysis.
    Talwalker S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Mar; 6(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 8838778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials: opportunities and limitations created by access to raw data.
    Rogozińska E; Marlin N; Thangaratinam S; Khan KS; Zamora J
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Oct; 22(5):157-162. PubMed ID: 28818966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice.
    Simmonds M; Stewart G; Stewart L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):76-83. PubMed ID: 26091948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Meta-analysis: the art of the systematic overview].
    Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(32):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8366959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.