These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34579822)

  • 41. Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs.
    Konnyu KJ; Taljaard M; Ivers NM; Moher D; Grimshaw JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():307-318. PubMed ID: 34171503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relative role of meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials in the assessment of medical therapies.
    Domanski MJ; Friedman LM
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Aug; 74(4):395-6. PubMed ID: 8059705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.
    Fisher DJ; Copas AJ; Tierney JF; Parmar MK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):949-67. PubMed ID: 21411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The potential of meta-synthesis for nursing care effectiveness research.
    Paterson BL; Thorne S
    Can J Nurs Res; 2003 Sep; 35(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 14603568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair-wise meta-analysis.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):346-370. PubMed ID: 26679486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis--part 2: hierarchical models.
    White IR; Welton NJ; Wood AM; Ades AE; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):728-45. PubMed ID: 17703502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():147-54. PubMed ID: 26944294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing continuous outcome data in pairwise and network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; White IR; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):721-41. PubMed ID: 25393541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A note on dealing with missing standard errors in meta-analyses of continuous outcome measures in WinBUGS.
    Stevens JW
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 21394888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measurement of quality of primary studies for meta-analysis.
    Brown SA
    Nurs Res; 1991; 40(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 1956814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A meta-analysis of meta-analyses.
    Sigman M
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jul; 96(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21723440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and depressive symptoms: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
    Wildisen L; Moutzouri E; Beglinger S; Syrogiannouli L; Cappola AR; Åsvold BO; Bakker SJL; Ceresini G; Dullaart R; Ferrucci L; Grabe H; Jukema JW; Nauck M; Trompet S; Völzke H; Westendorp RGJ; Gussekloo J; Peeters RP; Klöppel S; Aujesky D; Bauer DC; Rodondi N; Del Giovane C; Feller M;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029716. PubMed ID: 31350252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Design, Analysis, and Reporting of Crossover Trials for Inclusion in a Meta-Analysis.
    Li T; Yu T; Hawkins BS; Dickersin K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133023. PubMed ID: 26284684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Meta-analyses in cancer clinical trials: principles and pitfalls.
    Benson JR; Saeb-Parsy K
    World J Surg; 2006 Jul; 30(7):1177-83. PubMed ID: 16794898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
    Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Meta-analysis: its importance in cost-effectiveness studies.
    Simes J
    Med J Aust; 1990 Aug; 153(S1):S13-6. PubMed ID: 2116581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Imputation of response rates from means and standard deviations in schizophrenia.
    Samara MT; Spineli LM; Furukawa TA; Engel RR; Davis JM; Salanti G; Leucht S
    Schizophr Res; 2013 Dec; 151(1-3):209-14. PubMed ID: 24262679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts.
    O'Rourke K; Detsky AS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(10):1021-4. PubMed ID: 2809651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.