BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34579996)

  • 1. Do hospital consent forms for cardiology procedures meet health literacy standards? Evaluation of understandability and readability.
    Peiris R; Cornell S; Greaves K; Bonner C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 May; 105(5):1254-1260. PubMed ID: 34579996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.
    Eltorai AE; Naqvi SS; Ghanian S; Eberson CP; Weiss AP; Born CT; Daniels AH
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Dec; 8(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 26678039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
    Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
    S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis.
    O'Sullivan L; Sukumar P; Crowley R; McAuliffe E; Doran P
    BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e037994. PubMed ID: 32883734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How readable are orthognathic surgery consent forms?
    Meade MJ; Dreyer CW
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100689. PubMed ID: 36117084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is There a Difference Between the Readabilities of Informed Consent Forms Used for Elective and Emergency Procedures in Turkey?
    Sönmez MG; Sönmez LÖ; Kozanhan B; Dündar ZD
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 May; 54(3):626-630. PubMed ID: 33301132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.
    Harris VC; Links AR; Hong P; Walsh J; Schoo DP; Tunkel DE; Stewart CM; Boss EF
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 28842989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.
    Lee SE; Brown WC; Gelpi MW; Kimple AJ; Senior BA; Zanation AM; Thorp BD; Ebert CS
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2020 Jun; 10(6):773-778. PubMed ID: 32282135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?
    Balakrishnan V; Chandy Z; Verma SP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Nov; 155(5):758-763. PubMed ID: 27329416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.
    Bonner C; Patel P; Fajardo MA; Zhuang R; Trevena L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e025173. PubMed ID: 30872547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient education materials assessment tool for laryngectomy health information.
    Wong K; Gilad A; Cohen MB; Kirke DN; Jalisi SM
    Head Neck; 2017 Nov; 39(11):2256-2263. PubMed ID: 28815835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of patient information and consent documents in rheumatological studies.
    Hamnes B; van Eijk-Hustings Y; Primdahl J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 27422433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Readability of Clinical Trial Consent Forms for Surgical Specialties.
    Karimi AH; Guyler MR; Hecht CJ; Burkhart RJ; Acuña AJ; Kamath AF
    J Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 296():711-719. PubMed ID: 38367522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.
    Balakrishnan V; Chandy Z; Hseih A; Bui TL; Verma SP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 154(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 26861227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.
    Lipari M; Berlie H; Saleh Y; Hang P; Moser L
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jan; 76(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 31408087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.