These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34580782)

  • 1. Changes in Tissue Composition and Load Response After Transtibial Amputation Indicate Biomechanical Adaptation.
    Bramley JL; Worsley PR; Bader DL; Everitt C; Darekar A; King L; Dickinson AS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3176-3188. PubMed ID: 34580782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation.
    Fergason J; Smith DG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):76-84. PubMed ID: 10212599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
    Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the interactions between a prosthetic socket, polyurethane liners and the residual limb in transtibial amputees using non-linear finite element analysis.
    Simpson G; Fisher C; Wright DK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():343-7. PubMed ID: 11347414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation.
    Sanders JE; Lam D; Dralle AJ; Okumura R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jan; 34(1):19-43. PubMed ID: 9021623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs.
    Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of prosthetic fit and residual limbs following transtibial amputation.
    Bocobo CR; Castellote JM; MacKinnon D; Gabrielle-Bergman A
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 9505248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging technology in transtibial socket research: a pilot study.
    Buis AW; Condon B; Brennan D; McHugh B; Hadley D
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 17436174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marker-based method to measure movement between the residual limb and a transtibial prosthetic socket.
    Childers WL; Siebert S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):720-728. PubMed ID: 26527758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with trans-tibial amputation.
    Silver-Thorn MB; Childress DS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1996 Jul; 33(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 8823671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using magnetic panels to enlarge a transtibial prosthetic socket.
    Coburn KA; DeGrasse NS; Allyn KJ; Larsen BG; Garbini JL; Sanders JE
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Dec; 110():103924. PubMed ID: 36564131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes.
    Safari MR; Meier MR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):491-508. PubMed ID: 26436666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do transtibial residual limbs adjust to intermittent incremental socket volume changes?
    Larsen BG; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Brzostowski JT; Garbini JL; Sanders JE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):528-539. PubMed ID: 31339448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring discomfort-An objective method for quantifying peak pressure discomfort and improved fit in adults with transtibial amputation.
    Binedell T; Ghazali MFB; Wong C; Subburaj K; Blessing L
    PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):482-492. PubMed ID: 35233956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees.
    Dakhil N; Tarrade T; Behr M; Mo F; Evin M; Thefenne L; Liu T; Llari M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation on effects of amputee's physiological parameters on maximum pressure developed at the prosthetic socket interface using artificial neural network.
    Nayak C; Singh A; Chaudhary H; Unune DR
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Oct; 25(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 28854522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of the residual tibia in transtibial amputation.
    Pinzur MS; Reddy N; Charuk G; Osterman H; Vrbos L
    Foot Ankle Int; 1996 Sep; 17(9):538-40. PubMed ID: 8886780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis.
    Pirouzi G; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():849073. PubMed ID: 25197716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
    Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review.
    Mak AF; Zhang M; Boone DA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 11392649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.