BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34581434)

  • 1. Differences in chlorhexidine mouthrinses formulations influence the quantitative and qualitative changes in in-vitro oral biofilms.
    Zayed N; Boon N; Bernaerts K; Chatzigiannidou I; Van Holm W; Verspecht T; Teughels W
    J Periodontal Res; 2022 Jan; 57(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 34581434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation.
    Blanc V; Isabal S; Sánchez MC; Llama-Palacios A; Herrera D; Sanz M; León R
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Jun; 49(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 23815431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial efficacy of 0·05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinses.
    Sreenivasan PK; Haraszthy VI; Zambon JJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 56(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23039819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antimicrobials Influence Bond Stiffness and Detachment of Oral Bacteria.
    Song L; Hou J; van der Mei HC; Veeregowda DH; Busscher HJ; Sjollema J
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 26921277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents.
    Giuliana G; Pizzo G; Milici ME; Musotto GC; Giangreco R
    J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):729-33. PubMed ID: 9287062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of ATP bioluminescence as a tool to assess antimicrobial effects of mouthrinses in an in vitro subgingival-biofilm model.
    Sánchez MC; Llama-Palacios A; Marín MJ; Figuero E; León R; Blanc V; Herrera D; Sanz M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jan; 18(1):e86-92. PubMed ID: 23229259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
    Pan PC; Harper S; Ricci-Nittel D; Lux R; Shi W
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-20. PubMed ID: 20621239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
    Shapiro S; Giertsen E; Guggenheim B
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 12037365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride.
    Latimer J; Munday JL; Buzza KM; Forbes S; Sreenivasan PK; McBain AJ
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 15():169. PubMed ID: 26293609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antimicrobial effects of viscous mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and isopropyl methylphenol.
    Abe Y; Okazaki Y; Dainobu K; Matsuo K; Ishida H; Tsuga K
    Am J Dent; 2020 Oct; 33(5):235-238. PubMed ID: 33017524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic killing effectiveness of mouthrinses and a d-enantiomeric peptide on oral multispecies biofilms grown on dental restorative material surfaces.
    Hu J; Yu J; Liu H; Wang Z; Haapasalo M; Haney EF; Hancock REW; Deng S; Shen Y
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104552. PubMed ID: 37201774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different mouthrinses on morning breath.
    van Steenberghe D; Avontroodt P; Peeters W; Pauwels M; Coucke W; Lijnen A; Quirynen M
    J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1183-91. PubMed ID: 11577950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effect of chlorhexidine and some mouthrinses on bacterial biofilm formation on titanium surface.
    Baffone W; Sorgente G; Campana R; Patrone V; Sisti D; Falcioni T
    Curr Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 62(2):445-51. PubMed ID: 20686768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple approach to examine early oral microbial biofilm formation and the effects of treatments.
    Sreenivasan PK; Mattai J; Nabi N; Xu T; Gaffar A
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2004 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 15327641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Schönbächler N; Thurnheer T; Paqué PN; Attin T; Karygianni L
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1130255. PubMed ID: 36798085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study.
    Herrera D; Roldán S; Santacruz I; Santos S; Masdevall M; Sanz M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12694428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rapid procedure to ascertain the antimicrobial efficacy of oral care formulations.
    Sreenivasan PK; Tambs G; Gittins E; Nabi N; Gaffar A
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2003 Dec; 18(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 14622343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of chlorhexidine digluconate-containing formulations and other mouthrinses against periodontopathogenic microorganisms.
    Eick S; Goltz S; Nietzsche S; Jentsch H; Pfister W
    Quintessence Int; 2011 Sep; 42(8):687-700. PubMed ID: 21842009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses against specific oral microflora.
    Ronanki S; Kulkarni S; Hemalatha R; Kumar M; Reddy P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 27054861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
    Evans A; Leishman SJ; Walsh LJ; Seow WK
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):247-54; quiz 270. PubMed ID: 25989101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.