164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34581645)
1. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis.
Xie J; Wang M; Cao Y; Zhu Z; Ruan S; Ou M; Yu P; Shi J
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):7-15. PubMed ID: 34581645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ADM-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Setting: Long-Term Results.
Polotto S; Pedrazzi G; Bergamini M; D'Abbiero N; Cattelani L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(7):704-711. PubMed ID: 37479666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.
Ho G; Nguyen TJ; Shahabi A; Hwang BH; Chan LS; Wong AK
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 22421476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 26438439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstructions with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Preliminary Analysis of Outcomes.
Plotsker EL; Graziano FD; Rubenstein RN; Haglich K; Allen RJ; Coriddi MR; Dayan JH; Poulton R; McKernan C; Mehrara BJ; Matros E; Disa JJ; Nelson JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Apr; 153(4):786-793. PubMed ID: 37220401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Zhao X; Wu X; Dong J; Liu Y; Zheng L; Zhang L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):892-901. PubMed ID: 26377821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.
Cattelani L; Polotto S; Arcuri MF; Pedrazzi G; Linguadoca C; Bonati E
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
