These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34581927)

  • 21. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS.
    Ding J; Long L; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhou H; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Jing X; Ye Z; Wang F
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):847-854. PubMed ID: 32803416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.
    Bartnik K; Podgórska J; Rosiak G; Korzeniowski K; Giziński J; Sajdek M; Wróblewski T; Zieniewicz K; Nyckowski P; Rowiński O
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 147(12):3673-3683. PubMed ID: 33778924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System locoregional treatment response criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gupta P; Bansal A; Das GC; Kumar-M P; Chaluvashetty SB; Bhujade H; Gulati A; Kalra N
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7725-7733. PubMed ID: 33786656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6856-6867. PubMed ID: 33713172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?
    Zhang N; Xu H; Ren AH; Zhang Q; Yang DW; Ba T; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 33963801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The interreader agreement and validation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system.
    Li J; Ling W; Chen S; Ma L; Yang L; Lu Q; Luo Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108685. PubMed ID: 31606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-reader reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: a meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim DW; Jang JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Oct; 46(10):4671-4681. PubMed ID: 34156509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter-reader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS among radiologists with different levels of experience.
    Li W; Li L; Zhuang BW; Ruan SM; Hu HT; Huang Y; Lin MX; Xie XY; Kuang M; Lu MD; Chen LD; Wang W
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6758-6767. PubMed ID: 33675388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study.
    Fowler KJ; Tang A; Santillan C; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Heiken J; Jha RC; Weinreb J; Hussain H; Mitchell DG; Bashir MR; Costa EAC; Cunha GM; Coombs L; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Brancatelli G; Yeh B; Sirlin CB
    Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):173-185. PubMed ID: 29091751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi SH; Kim B; Choi JI; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4785-4793. PubMed ID: 33409795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS.
    Hu YX; Shen JX; Han J; Mao SY; Mao RS; Li Q; Li F; Guo ZX; Zhou JH
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():641195. PubMed ID: 33912456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy With Radiologic-Pathologic Explant Correlation in Patients With SBRT-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Mendiratta-Lala M; Aslam A; Maturen KE; Westerhoff M; Maurino C; Parikh ND; Sun Y; Sonnenday CJ; Stein EB; Shampain KL; Kaza RK; Cuneo K; Masch W; Do RKG; Lawrence TS; Owen D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Mar; 112(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 34644607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm predicts postsurgical recurrence in locoregional therapy-treated hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Youn SY; Kim B; Kim DH; Choi HJ; Sung PS; Choi JI
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 35348864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
    Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.