274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34581956)
1. Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.
Keeney-Bonthrone TP; Abbott KL; Haley C; Karmakar M; Hawes AM; Chang AC; Lin J; Lynch WR; Carrott PW; Lagisetty KH; Orringer MB; Reddy RM
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):883-891. PubMed ID: 34581956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similar Quality of Life After Conventional and Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.
Williams AM; Kathawate RG; Zhao L; Grenda TR; Bergquist CS; Brescia AA; Kilbane K; Barrett E; Chang AC; Lynch W; Lin J; Wakeam E; Lagisetty KH; Orringer MB; Reddy RM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 33745901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased postoperative complications after esophagectomy.
Dyas AR; Stuart CM; Bronsert MR; Schulick RD; McCarter MD; Meguid RA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Jul; 166(1):268-278. PubMed ID: 36577613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
