These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34582307)

  • 21. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
    Bergman M; Reichman O; Farkash R; Bin-Nun A; Samueloff A; Sapir AZ; Sela HY
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of prediction models for fetal growth restriction and birthweight: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J; Archer L; Coomar D; Snell KI; Smuk M; Oakey L; Haqnawaz S; Betrán AP; Chappell LC; Ganzevoort W; Gordijn S; Khalil A; Mol BW; Morris RK; Myers J; Papageorghiou AT; Thilaganathan B; Da Silva Costa F; Facchinetti F; Coomarasamy A; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Arenas Ramírez J; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Prefumo F; Saito S; Sletner L; Cecatti JG; Gabbay-Benziv R; Goffinet F; Baschat AA; Souza RT; Mone F; Farrar D; Heinonen S; Salvesen KÅ; Smits LJ; Bhattacharya S; Nagata C; Takeda S; van Gelder MM; Anggraini D; Yeo S; West J; Zamora J; Mistry H; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
    Health Technol Assess; 2024 Aug; 28(47):1-119. PubMed ID: 39252507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomarkers of impaired placentation at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Ciobanou A; Jabak S; De Castro H; Frei L; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 54(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 31100188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Competing risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates from biophysical markers at 19 to 24 weeks' gestation.
    Papastefanou I; Nowacka U; Syngelaki A; Mansukhani T; Karamanis G; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):530.e1-530.e19. PubMed ID: 33901487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis of mid-second trimester fetal growth restriction and associated outcomes.
    Lesser HT; D'Adamo C; O'Reilly G; Arrabal P; Ehsanipoor RM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):10168-10172. PubMed ID: 36100267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Pineles BL; Mendez-Figueroa H; Chauhan SP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Sep; 4(5):100672. PubMed ID: 35667554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Second and third trimester fetal ultrasound population screening for risks of preterm birth and small-size and large-size for gestational age at birth: a population-based prospective cohort study.
    Erkamp JS; Voerman E; Steegers EAP; Mulders AGMGJ; Reiss IKM; Duijts L; Jaddoe VWV; Gaillard R
    BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 32252740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personalized stratification of pregnancy care for small for gestational age neonates from biophysical markers at midgestation.
    Papastefanou I; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 229(1):57.e1-57.e14. PubMed ID: 36596441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks.
    Bakalis S; Peeva G; Gonzalez R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 25826154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mustafa HJ; Javinani A; Muralidharan V; Khalil A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101246. PubMed ID: 38072237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women.
    Martín-Palumbo G; Atanasova VB; Rego Tejeda MT; Antolín Alvarado E; Bartha JL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6721-6726. PubMed ID: 34024243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Tarca AL; Hernandez-Andrade E; Ahn H; Garcia M; Xu Z; Korzeniewski SJ; Saker H; Chaiworapongsa T; Hassan SS; Yeo L; Romero R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detection and clinical outcome of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in the third trimester-A comparison between routine ultrasound examination and examination on indication.
    Bonnevier A; Maršál K; Källén K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jan; 101(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 34726265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women with positive first-trimester preterm preeclampsia screening test: the Great Obstetrical Syndromes cohort study.
    Boutin A; Guerby P; Gasse C; Tapp S; Bujold E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):204.e1-204.e7. PubMed ID: 32777265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Derivation and assessment of a sex-specific fetal growth standard.
    Blue NR; Allshouse AA; Heerboth S; Grobman W; Mercer B; Shanks A; Bregand-White JM; Simhan H; Reddy UM; Saade G; Parry S; Silver RM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9913-9921. PubMed ID: 35603475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.
    Papastefanou I; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Souretis K; Chrysanthopoulou E; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 57(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 33094535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Third-trimester growth diversity in small fetuses classified as appropriate-for-gestational age or small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Deter RL; Lee W; Dicker P; Tully EC; Cody F; Malone FD; Flood KM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):882-891. PubMed ID: 33998089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the RCOG guideline for the prediction of neonates that are small for gestational age and comparison with the competing risks model.
    Papastefanou I; Nowacka U; Buerger O; Akolekar R; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
    BJOG; 2021 Dec; 128(13):2110-2115. PubMed ID: 34139043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.