These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34582736)

  • 1. Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech recordings: methodological and theoretical implications.
    Pisanski K; Groyecka-Bernard A; Sorokowski P
    Biol Lett; 2021 Sep; 17(9):20210356. PubMed ID: 34582736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing accuracy in voice-based assessments of biological speaker traits across speech types.
    Sorokowski P; Groyecka-Bernard A; Frackowiak T; Kobylarek A; Kupczyk P; Sorokowska A; Misiak M; Oleszkiewicz A; Bugaj K; Włodarczyk M; Pisanski K
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22989. PubMed ID: 38151496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in human voice pitch are preserved from speech to screams, roars and pain cries.
    Pisanski K; Raine J; Reby D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Feb; 7(2):191642. PubMed ID: 32257325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Voice-Based Judgments of Socially Relevant Speaker Traits Differ Across Speech Types?
    Groyecka-Bernard A; Pisanski K; Frąckowiak T; Kobylarek A; Kupczyk P; Oleszkiewicz A; Sabiniewicz A; Wróbel M; Sorokowski P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3674-3694. PubMed ID: 36167068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of testosterone on speech production and perception: Linking hormone levels in males to vocal cues and female voice attractiveness ratings.
    Weirich M; Simpson AP; Knutti N
    Physiol Behav; 2024 Sep; 283():114615. PubMed ID: 38880296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundamental Frequency and Intensity Effects on Cepstral Measures in Vowels from Connected Speech of Speakers with Voice Disorders.
    Sampaio MC; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
    J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):422-431. PubMed ID: 31883852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic Characteristics of the Voice for Brazilian Portuguese Speakers Across the Life Span.
    Spazzapan EA; Fabron EMG; Berti LC; Chagas EFB; Marino VCC
    J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):876.e17-876.e26. PubMed ID: 33041178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech.
    Chen SH; Liu H; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1157-63. PubMed ID: 17348536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice f
    Kim JH; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1482. PubMed ID: 31067945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Articulatory, developmental, and gender effects on measures of fundamental frequency and jitter.
    Sussman JE; Sapienza C
    J Voice; 1994 Jun; 8(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 8061770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human roars communicate upper-body strength more effectively than do screams or aggressive and distressed speech.
    Raine J; Pisanski K; Bond R; Simner J; Reby D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213034. PubMed ID: 30830931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic voice variation in spontaneous speech.
    Lee Y; Kreiman J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3462. PubMed ID: 35649890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Evidence That Nonlinear Source-Filter Coupling Affects Harmonic Intensity and fo Stability During Instances of Harmonics Crossing Formants.
    Maxfield L; Palaparthi A; Titze I
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27501922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for vowels produced by male children.
    Arnold KS; Emanuel FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Sep; 22(3):613-26. PubMed ID: 502518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can intrinsic vowel Fo be explained by source/tract coupling?
    Ewan WG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 512198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence Tool to Fundamental Frequency as an Outcome Measure in People Seeking a More Feminine Voice.
    Bensoussan Y; Park C; Johns M; Brown S; Pinto J; Chang J; Courey M
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Nov; 131(11):2567-2571. PubMed ID: 33973649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic Predictors of Gender Attribution, Masculinity-Femininity, and Vocal Naturalness Ratings Amongst Transgender and Cisgender Speakers.
    Hardy TLD; Rieger JM; Wells K; Boliek CA
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):300.e11-300.e26. PubMed ID: 30503396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intonation and fundamental frequency in male-to-female transsexuals.
    Wolfe VI; Ratusnik DL; Smith FH; Northrop G
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Feb; 55(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 2299839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency modulation characteristics of sustained /a/ sung in vocal vibrato.
    Horii Y
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 2601313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in voice fundamental frequency following discharge of single motor units in cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscles.
    Larson CR; Kempster GB; Kistler MK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 3695447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.