These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34583131)

  • 1. The intuitive conceptualization and perception of variance.
    Konovalova E; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104906. PubMed ID: 34583131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.
    Bear A; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():25-37. PubMed ID: 27842702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The language of intuition: a thematic integration model of intuitive coherence judgments.
    Maldei T; Baumann N; Koole SL
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1183-1198. PubMed ID: 32122224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of effort for magical violations of intuitive physics.
    McCoy J; Ullman T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217513. PubMed ID: 31120990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.
    Lejarraga T; Hertwig R
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 147(6):535-564. PubMed ID: 34843298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships.
    Vasilyeva N; Blanchard T; Lombrozo T
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1265-1296. PubMed ID: 29687462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People's Judgments About Classic Property Law Cases.
    DeScioli P; Karpoff R
    Hum Nat; 2015 Jun; 26(2):184-209. PubMed ID: 26040244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections.
    Knobe J
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Aug; 9(8):357-9. PubMed ID: 16006176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moral learning as intuitive theory revision.
    Rhodes M; Wellman H
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():191-200. PubMed ID: 27613004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listening to your intuition in the face of distraction: Effects of taxing working memory on accuracy and bias of intuitive judgments of semantic coherence.
    Maldei T; Koole SL; Baumann N
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103975. PubMed ID: 31234115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism.
    Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology.
    Sosa FA; Ullman T; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ; Gerstenberg T
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104890. PubMed ID: 34487974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where did that come from?--Identifying the source of a sample.
    Lindskog M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 25163636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of a common ability in average and variability judgments.
    Cha O; Blake R; Gauthier I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 34282557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.