These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34583584)

  • 1. Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies of
    Keaney TA; Jones TM; Holman L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Sep; 288(1959):20211190. PubMed ID: 34583584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fitness consequences of the selfish supergene Segregation Distorter.
    Wong HWS; Holman L
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 31605400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epistatic selection on a selfish
    Navarro-Dominguez B; Chang CH; Brand CL; Muirhead CA; Presgraves DC; Larracuente AM
    Elife; 2022 Apr; 11():. PubMed ID: 35486424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meiotic drive changes sperm precedence patterns in house mice: potential for male alternative mating tactics?
    Sutter A; Lindholm AK
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 27328665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic variation but weak genetic covariation between pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Travers LM; Garcia-Gonzalez F; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1535-52. PubMed ID: 27159063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct spermiogenic phenotypes underlie sperm elimination in the Segregation Distorter meiotic drive system.
    Herbette M; Wei X; Chang CH; Larracuente AM; Loppin B; Dubruille R
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009662. PubMed ID: 34228705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cryptic male mate choice for high-quality females reduces male postcopulatory success in future matings.
    Anastasio OE; Sinclair CS; Pischedda A
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(6):1396-1407. PubMed ID: 37073992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Larracuente AM; Presgraves DC
    Genetics; 2012 Sep; 192(1):33-53. PubMed ID: 22964836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Reinhart M; Carney T; Clark AG; Fiumera AC
    J Hered; 2015; 106(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 25425680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex ratio distorter reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect.
    Price TAR; Bretman AJ; Avent TD; Snook RR; Hurst GDD; Wedell N
    Evolution; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 18373627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila.
    Singh SR; Singh BN; Hoenigsberg HF
    Genet Mol Res; 2002 Sep; 1(3):178-215. PubMed ID: 14963827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergence of responses to variable socio-sexual environments in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster evolving under altered operational sex ratios.
    Maggu K; Ahlawat N; Geeta Arun M; Meena A; Prasad NG
    Evolution; 2021 Feb; 75(2):414-426. PubMed ID: 33319380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Origin, evolution, and population genetics of the selfish Segregation Distorter gene duplication in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Brand CL; Larracuente AM; Presgraves DC
    Evolution; 2015 May; 69(5):1271-83. PubMed ID: 25828399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segregation distortion induced by wild-type RanGAP in Drosophila.
    Kusano A; Staber C; Ganetzky B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 May; 99(10):6866-70. PubMed ID: 11997467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female-driven mechanisms, ejaculate size and quality contribute to the lower fertility of sex-ratio distorter males in Drosophila simulans.
    Angelard C; Montchamp-Moreau C; Joly D
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():326. PubMed ID: 19055718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.
    Cramer ERA
    Cells; 2021 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33799610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mutations to the piRNA pathway component aubergine enhance meiotic drive of segregation distorter in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Gell SL; Reenan RA
    Genetics; 2013 Mar; 193(3):771-84. PubMed ID: 23267055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection drives the coevolution of male and female reproductive traits in Peromyscus mice.
    Weber WD; Fisher HS
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 36480400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.