These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34584647)

  • 1. Lingual retainer materials: Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of flowable nanocomposites and universal composite: An
    Nosouhian M; Monirifard M; Gharibpour F; Sadeghian S
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():69. PubMed ID: 34584647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins.
    Asefi S; Eskandarion S; Hamidiaval S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2016; 10(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 27651887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Jang YS; Nguyen TT; Ko YH; Lee DW; Baik BJ; Lee MH; Bae TS
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 11(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 30847044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.
    Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure Rates of Orthodontic Fixed Lingual Retainers bonded with Two Flowable Light-cured Adhesives: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial.
    Talic NF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 27659078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites.
    Lu H; Roeder LB; Lei L; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(2):102-8; discussion 109. PubMed ID: 16036126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Mechanical Loads and Surface Roughness on Wear of Silorane and Methacrylate-Based Posterior Composites.
    Tabatabaei MH; Arami S; Farahat F
    J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Nov; 13(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 28243302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing.
    Al Khuraif AA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 25220522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro wear of dual-cured bulkfill composites and flowable bulkfill composites.
    Roulet JF; Gummadi S; Hussein HS; Abdulhameed N; Shen C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jul; 32(5):512-520. PubMed ID: 32602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Surface roughness and gloss of novel flowable composites after polishing and simulated brushing wear].
    Wang RL; Yuan CY; Pan YX; Tian FC; Wang ZH; Wang XY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 52(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 28412791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of restorative materials to hydroxyapatite inserts and dimensional changes of insert-containing restorations during polymerization.
    Lezaja M; Veljovic D; Manojlovic D; Milosevic M; Mitrovic N; Janackovic D; Miletic V
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 25541508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities.
    Alkhudhairy F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 28050983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Caldeira de Andrada MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.