176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34585132)
21. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Osmotic cleaning of typical inorganic and organic foulants on reverse osmosis membrane for textile printing and dyeing wastewater treatment.
Hu Z; Guan D; Sun Z; Zhang Z; Shan Y; Wu Y; Gong C; Ren X
Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 336():139162. PubMed ID: 37290520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient.
Dreszer C; Flemming HC; Zwijnenburg A; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():200-11. PubMed ID: 24374131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chlorine disinfection significantly aggravated the biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane used for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Tong X; Yu T; Peng L; Bai Y; Zhao XH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2019 May; 154():246-257. PubMed ID: 30798179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Membrane cleaning in membrane distillation of reverse osmosis concentrate generated in landfill leachate treatment.
Jia X; Li K; Wang B; Zhao Z; Hou D; Wang J
Water Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 85(1):244-256. PubMed ID: 35050880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Phosphorus Concentration in Water Affects the Biofilm Community and the Produced Amount of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Reverse Osmosis Membrane Systems.
Javier L; Pulido-Beltran L; Kruithof J; Vrouwenvelder JS; Farhat NM
Membranes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cleaning efficacy of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin for biofouling reduction on reverse osmosis membranes.
Alayande AB; Kim LH; Kim IS
Biofouling; 2016; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 26923225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biofouling control by phosphorus limitation strongly depends on the assimilable organic carbon concentration.
Javier L; Farhat NM; Desmond P; Linares RV; Bucs S; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116051. PubMed ID: 32622233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biofouling and me: My Stockholm syndrome with biofilms.
Flemming HC
Water Res; 2020 Apr; 173():115576. PubMed ID: 32044598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes under different shear rates during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition.
Al Ashhab A; Gillor O; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():86-95. PubMed ID: 25262553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biofouling and microbial communities in membrane distillation and reverse osmosis.
Zodrow KR; Bar-Zeev E; Giannetto MJ; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13155-64. PubMed ID: 25295386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of disinfection-residual-bacteria (DRB) after seven different kinds of disinfection: Biofilm formation, membrane fouling and mechanisms.
Wang HB; Wu YH; Wang WL; Chen Z; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Xue S; Tong X; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():157079. PubMed ID: 35779720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
Malaeb L; Le-Clech P; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ayoub GM; Saikaly PE
Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5447-63. PubMed ID: 23863390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nitric oxide treatment for the control of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling.
Barnes RJ; Low JH; Bandi RR; Tay M; Chua F; Aung T; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Rice SA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Apr; 81(7):2515-24. PubMed ID: 25636842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of engineered environment on microbial community structure in biofilter and biofilm on reverse osmosis membrane.
Jeong S; Cho K; Jeong D; Lee S; Leiknes T; Vigneswaran S; Bae H
Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():227-237. PubMed ID: 28759795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
