BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34585608)

  • 1. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.
    Kim SW; Joo I; Kim HC; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Lee JM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 32006170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Lyu R; Jia K; Xu PJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38605217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.
    Park S; Joo I; Lee DH; Bae JS; Yoo J; Kim SW; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2020 Sep; 296(3):554-561. PubMed ID: 32692297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Shropshire EL; Chaudhry M; Miller CM; Allen BC; Bozdogan E; Cardona DM; King LY; Janas GL; Do RK; Kim CY; Ronald J; Bashir MR
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):226-234. PubMed ID: 31038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chaudhry M; McGinty KA; Mervak B; Lerebours R; Li C; Shropshire E; Ronald J; Commander L; Hertel J; Luo S; Bashir MR; Burke LMB
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 31845843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response.
    Abdelrahman AS; Ekladious MEY; Badran EM; Madkour SS
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022 Nov; 103(11):524-534. PubMed ID: 35787988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective validation of a new diagnostic criterion for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: can hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase be used as an alternative to washout with the aid of ancillary features?
    Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Jeon JH; Han JK
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 30255250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma after trans-arterial chemoembolization.
    Kierans AS; Najjar M; Dutruel SP; Gavlin A; Chen C; Lee MJ; Askin G; Halazun KJ
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():117-122. PubMed ID: 34303189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.
    Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Chen J; Zhang L; Rong D; Kuang S; He B; Wang J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7715-7724. PubMed ID: 33782766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Xie S; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jiang T; Liu W; Rong D; Sun L; Zhang L; He B; Wang J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Feb; 47(2):596-607. PubMed ID: 34773467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical analysis of major and ancillary features of LI-RADS v2018 in the differentiation of small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    De Gaetano AM; Catalano M; Pompili M; Marini MG; Rodríguez Carnero P; Gullì C; Infante A; Iezzi R; Ponziani FR; Cerrito L; Marrone G; Giuliante F; Ardito F; Rapaccini GL; Vecchio FM; Giraldi L; Manfredi R;
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(18):7786-7801. PubMed ID: 31599447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic value of ancillary features favoring malignancy in hypervascular observations ≥ 10 mm at intermediate (LR-3) and high probability (LR-4) for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cannella R; Vernuccio F; Sagreiya H; Choudhury KR; Iranpour N; Marin D; Furlan A
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3770-3781. PubMed ID: 32107603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
    Song JS; Choi EJ; Hwang SB; Hwang HP; Choi H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):401-410. PubMed ID: 29922928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing LI-RADS: ancillary features screened from LR-3/4 categories can improve the diagnosis of HCC on MRI.
    Zhang ZX; Xv H; Du YN; Lv ZB; Yang ZH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):117. PubMed ID: 38515017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LI-RADS: Diagnostic Performance of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointensity and Major Imaging Features of LR-3 and LR-4 Lesions Measuring 10-19 mm With Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement.
    Vernuccio F; Cannella R; Meyer M; Choudhoury KR; Gonzáles F; Schwartz FR; Gupta RT; Bashir MR; Furlan A; Marin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W57-W65. PubMed ID: 31039012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.