These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34587043)

  • 21. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians' Understanding of Measurement Error.
    Frans N; Hummelen B; Albers CJ; Paap MCS
    Assessment; 2023 Dec; 30(8):2449-2460. PubMed ID: 36726201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data.
    Padilla LM; Ruginski IT; Creem-Regehr SH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):40. PubMed ID: 29051918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working memory in the processing of the Iowa Gambling Task: an individual differences approach.
    Bagneux V; Thomassin N; Gonthier C; Roulin JL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81498. PubMed ID: 24278447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual differences reveal limited mixed-category effects during a visual working memory task.
    Mruczek REB; Killebrew KW; Berryhill ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jan; 122():1-10. PubMed ID: 30528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sequential encoding paradigm reliably captures the individual differences from a simultaneous visual working memory task.
    Zhao C; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 36624199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The NASA Task Load Index as a measure of overall workload among neonatal, paediatric and adult intensive care nurses.
    Tubbs-Cooley HL; Mara CA; Carle AC; Gurses AP
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2018 Jun; 46():64-69. PubMed ID: 29449130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased distractibility in schizotypy: Independent of individual differences in working memory capacity?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Sörqvist P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):565-578. PubMed ID: 27028661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index as a tool to evaluate the learning curve for endoscopy training.
    Mohamed R; Raman M; Anderson J; McLaughlin K; Rostom A; Coderre S
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Mar; 28(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 24619638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why Authors Don't Visualize Uncertainty.
    Hullman J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Jan; 26(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 31425093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Raghunath N; Fournier LR; Kogan C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):1970-1985. PubMed ID: 32564130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The composite complex span: French validation of a short working memory task.
    Gonthier C; Thomassin N; Roulin JL
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25669761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach.
    Ryskin RA; Benjamin AS; Tullis J; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):898-915. PubMed ID: 26214163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence.
    Brevers D; Bechara A; Cleeremans A; Kornreich C; Verbanck P; Noël X
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Jul; 38(7):1924-31. PubMed ID: 24948198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Working memory capacity and individual differences in the making of reinstatement and elaborative inferences.
    Barreyro JP; Cevasco J; Burín D; Molinari Marotto C
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Jul; 15(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 22774420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Working memory capacity and task goals modulate error-related ERPs.
    Coleman JR; Watson JM; Strayer DL
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28295409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differently confident: Susceptibility to bias in perceptual judgments of size interacts with working memory capacity.
    A Sanchez C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1174-85. PubMed ID: 26902248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.