182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34587374)
1. Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of M category as defined by the 7th and 8th editions of the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colorectal cancer and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification.
Shida D; Boku N; Nakamura Y; Yoshida T; Tanabe T; Yasui K; Takashima A; Kanemitsu Y
Cancer Med; 2021 Oct; 10(20):6937-6946. PubMed ID: 34587374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introducing the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification as relevant to colorectal cancer, anal cancer and appendiceal cancer: a comparison study with the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis and the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma.
Shida D; Kanemitsu Y; Hamaguchi T; Shimada Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):321-328. PubMed ID: 30608547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification to identify stage III colorectal cancer.
Kitamura K; Shida D; Sekine S; Ahiko Y; Nakamura Y; Moritani K; Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Sep; 26(9):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 34085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification of the Japanese staging system for rectal cancer, focusing on differences with the TNM classification.
Arabiki M; Shimada Y; Nakano M; Tanaka K; Oyanagi H; Nakano M; Ling Y; Okuda S; Takii Y; Wakai T
Surg Today; 2020 Nov; 50(11):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 32440825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the tumor deposits be counted as metastatic lymph nodes in the UICC TNM staging system for colorectal cancer?
Song YX; Gao P; Wang ZN; Liang JW; Sun Z; Wang MX; Dong YL; Wang XF; Xu HM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e34087. PubMed ID: 22461900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verifying the M1c category of CRC: analysis of the data from a Japanese multi-institutional database.
Tanaka T; Ozawa H; Nakagawa Y; Hirata A; Fujita S; Sugihara K
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Jan; 35(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 31797096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal colorectal cancer staging criteria in TNM classification.
Ueno H; Mochizuki H; Akagi Y; Kusumi T; Yamada K; Ikegami M; Kawachi H; Kameoka S; Ohkura Y; Masaki T; Kushima R; Takahashi K; Ajioka Y; Hase K; Ochiai A; Wada R; Iwaya K; Shimazaki H; Nakamura T; Sugihara K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(13):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Modified Tumor-Node-Metastasis Classification for Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer.
Zhang C; Mei Z; Pei J; Abe M; Zeng X; Huang Q; Nishiyama K; Akimoto N; Haruki K; Nan H; Meyerhardt JA; Zhang R; Li X; Ogino S; Ugai T
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33554032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. M1b Disease in the 8th Edition of TNM Staging of Lung Cancer: Pattern of Single Extrathoracic Metastasis and Clinical Outcome.
Park H; Dahlberg SE; Lydon CA; Araki T; Hatabu H; Rabin MS; Johnson BE; Nishino M
Oncologist; 2019 Aug; 24(8):e749-e754. PubMed ID: 30696724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposal of new classification for stage III colon cancer based on the lymph node ratio: analysis of 4,172 patients from multi-institutional database in Japan.
Sugimoto K; Sakamoto K; Tomiki Y; Goto M; Kotake K; Sugihara K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):528-34. PubMed ID: 25160735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System Sufficiently Reasonable for All Patients with Noncardia Gastric Cancer? A 12,549-Patient International Database Study.
Lu J; Zheng ZF; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):2002-2011. PubMed ID: 29725896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic impact of M descriptors of the 8th edition of TNM classification of lung cancer.
Dias M; Antunes A; Campainha S; Conde S; Barroso A
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Mar; 9(3):685-691. PubMed ID: 28449476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the 7th and proposed 8th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent radical surgery.
Zhang D; Zheng Y; Wang Z; Huang Q; Cao X; Wang F; Liu S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 28716377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.
Yang F; Zhong Q; Huang Z; Lian M; Fang J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():10. PubMed ID: 30733707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the 8th TNM classification for small-cell lung cancer in a retrospective material from Sweden.
Tendler S; Grozman V; Lewensohn R; Tsakonas G; Viktorsson K; De Petris L
Lung Cancer; 2018 Jun; 120():75-81. PubMed ID: 29748020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with 10-year follow-up.
Wu LR; Zhang XM; Xie XD; Lu Y; Wu JF; He X
Oral Oncol; 2019 Nov; 98():141-146. PubMed ID: 31586896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system in terms of predicting recurrence and survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Nam SH; Bae MR; Roh JL; Gong G; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Dec; 87():158-164. PubMed ID: 30527232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
