BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34587800)

  • 1. Acetabular complications are the most common cause for revision surgery following proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement : what is the best bearing option in the primary and revision setting?
    Lex JR; Evans S; Parry MC; Jeys L; Stevenson JD
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Oct; 103-B(10):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 34587800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemiarthroplasty proximal femoral endoprostheses following tumour reconstruction: is acetabular replacement necessary?
    Stevenson JD; Kumar VS; Cribb GL; Cool P
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 29305458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acetabular Erosion After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Femoral Replacement for Malignant Bone Tumors.
    Theil C; Möllenbeck B; Gosheger G; Schmidt-Bräkling T; Andreou D; Henrichs MP; Dieckmann R
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2692-2697. PubMed ID: 31279599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?
    Houdek MT; Rose PS; Ferguson PC; Sim FH; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Wunder JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 30811367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?
    Theil C; Schwarze J; Smolle MA; Pützler J; Moellenbeck B; Schneider KN; Schulze M; Klingebiel S; Gosheger G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is bipolar hemiarthroplasty an appropriate type of hip articulation following proximal femoral or total femoral resections for musculoskeletal malignancies?
    Saglam F; Baysal O; Sirin E; Sofulu O; Kesimer MD; Erol B
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Feb; 142(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 34091707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LUMiC
    Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
    Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uni- and bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a modern cemented femoral component provides elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with equal functional outcome and survivorship at medium-term follow-up.
    Kanto K; Sihvonen R; Eskelinen A; Laitinen M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(9):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25055754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
    Gibon E; Barut N; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemiarthroplasties in young patients with osteonecrosis or a tumour of the proximal femur; an observational cohort study.
    van Egmond PW; Taminiau AH; van der Heide HJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():31. PubMed ID: 23327536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
    Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.
    Sah AP; Estok DM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 18310700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midterm results of revision total hip arthroplasty for migrated bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis using cementless cup with the rim-fit technique.
    Tanaka T; Kaneko T; Hidaka R; Hashikura K; Ishikura H; Moro T; Tanaka S
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020954315. PubMed ID: 32996412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of massive acetabular bone defects in revision arthroplasty of the hip using a reconstruction cage and porous metal augment.
    Mäkinen TJ; Abolghasemian M; Watts E; Fichman SG; Kuzyk P; Safir OA; Gross AE
    Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):607-613. PubMed ID: 28455469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
    Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.