These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3458848)

  • 21. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancement of the TMJ region in lateral cephalograms.
    O'Ryan FS; Croall DV
    J Clin Orthod; 1987 Jan; 21(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 3469215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
    Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
    Patrux C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The resolving capacity of systems for the reproduction of x-ray images].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):12-5. PubMed ID: 11076357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Perceptibility of details in conventional and digital teleradiography--a comparative study].
    Ruppenthal T; Doll G; Sergl HG; Fricke B
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1033-42. PubMed ID: 1842243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparative microdensitometric study of various pairs of Kodak and Polaroid surface sensitive screens in teleradiography].
    Le Denmat D; Pellerin Y
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3866280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
    Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitometric evaluation of rare earth intensifying screen systems.
    Thunthy KH; Boozer CH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jan; 59(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 3856198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison between two dental films and two film-screen combinations in detecting low contrast defects and initial caries.
    Sanderink GC; Scholte CM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 3869566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.