These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34589032)

  • 1. Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement.
    Lu Q; Zhu X; Cheong CM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():739962. PubMed ID: 34589032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer feedback and Chinese medical students' English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study.
    Wu C; Zhang YW; Li AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Aug; 23(1):578. PubMed ID: 37587429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Trained Peer vs. Teacher Feedback on EFL Students' Writing Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Internalization of Motivation.
    Cui Y; Schunn CD; Gai X; Jiang Y; Wang Z
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():788474. PubMed ID: 34899541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing.
    Sun Q; Chen F; Yin S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1070618. PubMed ID: 37435098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students' argumentative essay quality.
    Noroozi O; Banihashem SK; Biemans HJA; Smits M; Vervoort MTW; Verbaan CL
    Educ Inf Technol (Dordr); 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37361820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students.
    Tai HC; Pan MY; Lee BO
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jun; 35(6):782-8. PubMed ID: 25753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Writing Anxiety and Motivation on EFL College Students' Self-Evaluative Judgments of Corrective Feedback.
    Tsao JJ; Tseng WT; Wang C
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Apr; 120(2):219-241. PubMed ID: 28558625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of mastery experiences, performance feedback, and task effort to elementary-aged students' self-efficacy in writing.
    Hier BO; Mahony KE
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Sep; 33(3):408-418. PubMed ID: 28857589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing.
    He W; Gao Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1177094. PubMed ID: 37519361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Students use of exemplars to support academic writing in higher education: An integrative review.
    Carter R; Salamonson Y; Ramjan LM; Halcomb E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Jun; 65():87-93. PubMed ID: 29547812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracing the Path Toward Self-Regulated Revision: An Interplay of Instructor Feedback, Peer Feedback, and Revision Goals.
    Li W; Zhang F
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():612088. PubMed ID: 33613365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of providing peer feedback on learners' genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing.
    Wu H; Zhu H; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1059555. PubMed ID: 36533036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity.
    Hulsman RL; van der Vloodt J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Mar; 98(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 25433967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment.
    Adwan J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jun; 41():67-72. PubMed ID: 27138485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of dental students' written peer feedback from a prospective peer assessment protocol.
    Tricio J; Woolford M; Escudier M
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2016 Nov; 20(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 26901687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does it matter who writes down the feedback? A comparison of teacher- vs. student-completed clinical encounter cards during clinical rotations in veterinary studies.
    Buchner HHF; Burger C; Ehlers JP
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(2):Doc23. PubMed ID: 29963613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a peer- and self-grading process for clinical writing assignments.
    Storjohann T; Pogge E; Peckham A; Raney E; Barletta JF
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Oct; 11(10):979-986. PubMed ID: 31685181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Holistic feedback approach with video and peer discussion under teacher supervision.
    Hunukumbure AD; Smith SF; Das S
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 28962567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflection and peer feedback for augmenting emotional intelligence among undergraduate students: A quasi-experimental study from a rural medical college in central India.
    Raut AV; Gupta SS
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2019; 32(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 31512586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.