157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34589433)
1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Alone for Oncological Outcomes of Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Li W; Zhang W; Sun L; Wang L; Cui Z; Zhao H; Wang D; Zhang Y; Guo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():730753. PubMed ID: 34589433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors.
Ye Y; Li Z; Kang S; Yang Y; Ling B; Wang L; Yao J; Li P; Wang X; Gong S; Fan H; Kong Y; Cao Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2023 May; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37161372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study.
Ye Y; Zhang G; Li Z; Chen B; Zhao H; Yang Y; Wang L; Yao J; Chen X; Huang Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Cancer Med; 2023 Oct; 12(19):19617-19632. PubMed ID: 37768092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kokka F; Bryant A; Olaitan A; Brockbank E; Powell M; Oram D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 8(8):CD010260. PubMed ID: 35994243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery due to lack of radiotherapy equipment: A retrospective comparison with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Zeng J; Sun P; Ping Q; Jiang S; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0266001. PubMed ID: 35324998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stages IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a multicenter prospective trial.
Hu Y; Han Y; Shen Y; Chen J; Chen Y; Chen Y; Tang J; Xue M; Hong L; Cheng W; Wang D; Liang Z; Wang Y; Zhang Q; Xing H; Zhang Y; Yi C; Yu Z; Chen Y; Cui M; Ma C; Yang H; Li R; Long P; Zhao Y; Qu P; Tao G; Yang L; Wu S; Liu Z; Yang P; Lv W; Xie X; Ma D; Wang H; Li K
BMC Cancer; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1270. PubMed ID: 36471257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
Chen X; Liang W; Duan H; Wu M; Zhan X; Dai E; Lv Q; Xie Q; Liu R; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():800049. PubMed ID: 35494051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.
Yin M; Zhao F; Lou G; Zhang H; Sun M; Li C; Hou Y; Li X; Meng F; Chen X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21330834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Wang W; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1331. PubMed ID: 31828044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
