234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34591554)
1. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 34591554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow and steady? Strategic adjustments in response caution are moderately reliable and correlate across tasks.
Hedge C; Vivian-Griffiths S; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102797. PubMed ID: 31421398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
Lee PS; Sewell DK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are cognitive control processes reliable?
Whitehead PS; Brewer GA; Blais C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):765-778. PubMed ID: 30047768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.
White CN; Servant M; Logan GD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):286-301. PubMed ID: 28357629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.
Keye D; Wilhelm O; Oberauer K; van Ravenzwaaij D
Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):762-76. PubMed ID: 19034502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.
Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Vivian-Griffiths S; Sumner P
Psychol Bull; 2018 Nov; 144(11):1200-1227. PubMed ID: 30265012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conflict processing in kindergarten children: New evidence from distribution analyses reveals the dynamics of incorrect response activation and suppression.
Ambrosi S; Servant M; Blaye A; Burle B
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jan; 177():36-52. PubMed ID: 30165290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linking computational models of two core tasks of cognitive control.
Robinson MM; Steyvers M
Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):71-101. PubMed ID: 36227284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
Weissman DH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
Freitas AL; Clark SL
Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the Flanker Task.
Servant M; Evans NJ
Psychol Aging; 2020 Sep; 35(6):831-849. PubMed ID: 32658539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
Hershman R; Henik A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.
Littman R; Kalanthroff E
Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2420-2427. PubMed ID: 32894341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.
Ye W; Damian MF
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jan; 76(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 35045771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive processing speed deficits in multiple sclerosis: Dissociating sensorial and motor processing changes from cognitive processing speed.
Clough M; Dobbing J; Stankovich J; Ternes A; Kolbe S; White OB; Fielding J
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2020 Feb; 38():101522. PubMed ID: 31785491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of conflict diffusion models in the flanker task through pseudolikelihood Bayes factors.
Evans NJ; Servant M
Psychol Rev; 2020 Jan; 127(1):114-135. PubMed ID: 31599635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks.
West R
Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1122-35. PubMed ID: 12667546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The neutral condition in conflict tasks: On the violation of the midpoint assumption in reaction time trends.
Smith P; Ulrich R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 May; 77(5):1023-1043. PubMed ID: 37674259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
