These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Gender bias in scholarly peer review. Helmer M; Schottdorf M; Neef A; Battaglia D Elife; 2017 Mar; 6():. PubMed ID: 28322725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mitigating potential bias in peer review at IFAR. Smith TL; Turner J; Lin S; Luong A Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2023 Feb; 13(2):105-106. PubMed ID: 36453142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. McKenzie ND; Liu R; Chiu AV; Chavez-MacGregor M; Frohlich D; Ahmad S; Hendricks CB JCO Oncol Pract; 2022 Dec; 18(12):791-799. PubMed ID: 36215686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A proposal for an 'equal peer-review' statement. Moustafa K Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Aug; 36(8):494-5. PubMed ID: 26112779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review - The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Gregory AT; Denniss AR Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1148-1153. PubMed ID: 31230792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To see or not to see: a cross-sectional study suggesting lack of bias towards authors in the peer-review process. Daou H; Gu L; Lipner SR Br J Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 185(6):1249-1251. PubMed ID: 34185320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Personal Bias in Peer Review. Maynard C Med Care; 2018 Jul; 56(7):643. PubMed ID: 29750682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias in peer review. Eaton K; Anthony H J R Soc Med; 2000 Jun; 93(6):338. PubMed ID: 10911846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal. Rezaeian M J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():248-9. PubMed ID: 26051243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review. Kern-Goldberger AR; James R; Berghella V; Miller ES Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):43-50.e4. PubMed ID: 35120887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? Bazi T Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Mar; 31(3):481-483. PubMed ID: 31820012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. For a paradigm shift in peer review, bold steps need to be taken. Teixeira da Silva JA Radiol Med; 2023 Jul; 128(7):886-887. PubMed ID: 37285066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]