These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34592246)
1. Prediction of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy with machine learning. Liang Y; Ding R; Wang J; Gong X; Yu Z; Pan L; Huang J; Li R; Su Y; Zhu S; Ge J Int J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 344():120-126. PubMed ID: 34592246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Machine-Learning for Prediction of the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The SMART-AV Study. Howell SJ; Stivland T; Stein K; Ellenbogen KA; Tereshchenko LG JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Dec; 7(12):1505-1515. PubMed ID: 34454883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of Systematic Right Ventricular Assessment in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Candidates: A Machine Learning Approach. Galli E; Le Rolle V; Smiseth OA; Duchenne J; Aalen JM; Larsen CK; Sade EA; Hubert A; Anilkumar S; Penicka M; Linde C; Leclercq C; Hernandez A; Voigt JU; Donal E J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 May; 34(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 33422667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography. Lei J; Wang YG; Bhatta L; Ahmed J; Fan D; Wang J; Liu K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 31104177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and development of machine learning tools in the prediction of chronic kidney disease progression. Xiao J; Ding R; Xu X; Guan H; Feng X; Sun T; Zhu S; Ye Z J Transl Med; 2019 Apr; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 30971285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block. Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ventricular Electrical Delay Measured From Body Surface ECGs Is Associated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients From the MADIT-CRT Trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Plesinger F; Jurak P; Halamek J; Nejedly P; Leinveber P; Viscor I; Vondra V; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Couderc JP Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 11(5):e005719. PubMed ID: 29700054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using ensemble of ensemble machine learning methods to predict outcomes of cardiac resynchronization. Cai C; Tafti AP; Ngufor C; Zhang P; Xiao P; Dai M; Liu H; Noseworthy P; Chen M; Friedman PA; Cha YM J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Sep; 32(9):2504-2514. PubMed ID: 34260141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relation of QRS Duration to Clinical Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy. Biton Y; Kutyifa V; Cygankiewicz I; Goldenberg I; Klein H; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Ruwald AC; Ruwald MH; Moss AJ; Zareba W Circ Heart Fail; 2016 Feb; 9(2):e002667. PubMed ID: 26823498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. QRS frequency characteristics help predict response to cardiac resynchronization in left bundle branch block less than 150 milliseconds. Niebauer MJ; Rickard J; Polakof L; Tchou PJ; Varma N Heart Rhythm; 2014 Dec; 11(12):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25068573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method. Gallard A; Hubert A; Smiseth O; Voigt JU; Le Rolle V; Leclercq C; Bidaut A; Galli E; Donal E; Hernandez AI Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Mar; 37(3):989-998. PubMed ID: 33226549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Risum N Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Size Matters: Normalization of QRS Duration to Left Ventricular Dimension Improves Prediction of Long-Term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome. Zweerink A; Friedman DJ; Klem I; van de Ven PM; Vink C; Biesbroek PS; Hansen SM; Emerek K; Kim RJ; van Rossum AC; Atwater BD; Nijveldt R; Allaart CP Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e006767. PubMed ID: 30541355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine Learning Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response From Combination of Clinical and Model-Driven Data. Khamzin S; Dokuchaev A; Bazhutina A; Chumarnaya T; Zubarev S; Lyubimtseva T; Lebedeva V; Lebedev D; Gurev V; Solovyova O Front Physiol; 2021; 12():753282. PubMed ID: 34970154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Goldenberg I; Moss AJ; Hall WJ; Foster E; Goldberger JJ; Santucci P; Shinn T; Solomon S; Steinberg JS; Wilber D; Barsheshet A; McNitt S; Zareba W; Klein H; Circulation; 2011 Oct; 124(14):1527-36. PubMed ID: 21900084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]