These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34592286)

  • 21. Assessment of collection schemes for packaging and other recyclable waste in European Union-28 Member States and capital cities.
    Seyring N; Dollhofer M; Weißenbacher J; Bakas I; McKinnon D
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):947-56. PubMed ID: 27357560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Municipal solid waste prevention: A review of market-based instruments in six European Union countries.
    Magrini C; D'Addato F; Bonoli A
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 May; 38(1_suppl):3-22. PubMed ID: 31928165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reaching cost-saving effects by a mixed collection of light packagings together with residual household waste?
    Janz A; Günther M; Bilitewski B
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Sep; 29(9):982-90. PubMed ID: 21824983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Door-to-door recyclables collection programmes: Willingness to participate and influential factors with a case study in the city of Xanthi (Greece).
    Tsalis T; Amarantidou S; Calabró P; Nikolaou I; Komilis D
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):760-766. PubMed ID: 29589517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indicators and characteristics of PET packaging collected in a Deposit and Refund System pilot project.
    Martinho G; Santos P; Alves A; Ramos M
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25182. PubMed ID: 38356606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevention policies addressing packaging and packaging waste: Some emerging trends.
    Tencati A; Pogutz S; Moda B; Brambilla M; Cacia C
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():35-45. PubMed ID: 27372152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey and analysis of consumers' behaviour for electronic waste management in Bangladesh.
    Ananno AA; Masud MH; Dabnichki P; Mahjabeen M; Chowdhury SA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 282():111943. PubMed ID: 33465720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Model for the separate collection of packaging waste in Portuguese low-performing recycling regions.
    Oliveira V; Sousa V; Vaz JM; Dias-Ferreira C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 216():13-24. PubMed ID: 28468731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Current status of circularity for aluminum from household waste in Austria.
    Warrings R; Fellner J
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():217-224. PubMed ID: 29475615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. E-waste bans and U.S. households' preferences for disposing of their e-waste.
    Milovantseva N; Saphores JD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():8-16. PubMed ID: 23603771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of junk buyers' contribution to recycling of household waste in Hanoi, Vietnam, through a physical composition analysis.
    Kawai K; Osako M; Matsui S; Dong NT
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):681-8. PubMed ID: 22584265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A case study of packaging waste collection systems in Portugal - Part I: Performance and operation analysis.
    Martinho G; Gomes A; Santos P; Ramos M; Cardoso J; Silveira A; Pires A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():96-107. PubMed ID: 28161334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Collection behaviour of lightweight packaging waste by individual households and implications for the analysis of collection schemes.
    Thoden van Velzen EU; Brouwer MT; Feil A
    Waste Manag; 2019 Apr; 89():284-293. PubMed ID: 31079742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "If it is not made easy for me, I will just not bother". A qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to recycling plastics.
    Roy D; Berry E; Dempster M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267284. PubMed ID: 35503782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identifying the status and differences between urban and rural residents' behaviors and attitudes toward express packaging waste management in Guangdong Province, China.
    Cai K; Xie Y; Song Q; Sheng N; Wen Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 797():148996. PubMed ID: 34303240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of plastic waste generation and its potential recycling of household solid waste in Can Tho City, Vietnam.
    Thanh NP; Matsui Y; Fujiwara T
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Apr; 175(1-4):23-35. PubMed ID: 20490914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors related to recycling plastic packaging in Finland's new waste management scheme.
    Reijonen H; Bellman S; Murphy J; Kokkonen H
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jul; 131():88-97. PubMed ID: 34111827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and application of a predictive modelling approach for household packaging waste flows in sorting facilities.
    Kleinhans K; Hallemans M; Huysveld S; Thomassen G; Ragaert K; Van Geem KM; Roosen M; Mys N; Dewulf J; De Meester S
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 120():290-302. PubMed ID: 33333467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New developments in waste management in the Netherlands.
    Goorhuis M; Reus P; Nieuwenhuis E; Spanbroek N; Sol M; van Rijn J
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):67-77. PubMed ID: 22993136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A standardized inspection methodology to evaluate municipal solid waste collection performance.
    Calabrò PS; Komilis D
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():184-191. PubMed ID: 31176980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.