126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34592329)
1. Effects of seawater scrubbing on a microplanktonic community during a summer-bloom in the Baltic Sea.
Ytreberg E; Karlberg M; Hassellöv IM; Hedblom M; Nylund AT; Salo K; Imberg H; Turner D; Tripp L; Yong J; Wulff A
Environ Pollut; 2021 Dec; 291():118251. PubMed ID: 34592329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of scrubber washwater discharge on microplankton in the Baltic Sea.
Ytreberg E; Hassellöv IM; Nylund AT; Hedblom M; Al-Handal AY; Wulff A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Aug; 145():316-324. PubMed ID: 31590793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships.
Ülpre H; Eames I
Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Nov; 88(1-2):292-301. PubMed ID: 25284442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The potential future contribution of shipping to acidification of the Baltic Sea.
Turner DR; Edman M; Gallego-Urrea JA; Claremar B; Hassellöv IM; Omstedt A; Rutgersson A
Ambio; 2018 Apr; 47(3):368-378. PubMed ID: 28983824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecological effects of scrubber water discharge on coastal plankton: Potential synergistic effects of contaminants reduce survival and feeding of the copepod Acartia tonsa.
Koski M; Stedmon C; Trapp S
Mar Environ Res; 2017 Aug; 129():374-385. PubMed ID: 28687429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ocean acidification and desalination: climate-driven change in a Baltic Sea summer microplanktonic community.
Wulff A; Karlberg M; Olofsson M; Torstensson A; Riemann L; Steinhoff FS; Mohlin M; Ekstrand N; Chierici M
Mar Biol; 2018; 165(4):63. PubMed ID: 29563649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping.
Antturi J; Hänninen O; Jalkanen JP; Johansson L; Prank M; Sofiev M; Ollikainen M
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):431-440. PubMed ID: 27742151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impacts of exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) discharge waters on planktonic biological indicators.
Picone M; Russo M; Distefano GG; Baccichet M; Marchetto D; Volpi Ghirardini A; Lunde Hermansson A; Petrovic M; Gros M; Garcia E; Giubilato E; Calgaro L; Magnusson K; Granberg M; Marcomini A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 May; 190():114846. PubMed ID: 36965268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulation investigation on marine exhaust gas SO
Li W; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Liu C; Wang Y; Shen M; Dai H; Yang Y; Zheng C; Gao X
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 May; 72(5):383-402. PubMed ID: 34874231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASPEN PLUS desulfurization simulations for the scrubber of a large-scale marine diesel engine: main scrubbing section's desulfurization share optimization and superiority confirmation for the seawater/seawater cascade-scrubbing solution.
Wu S; Kuang M; Zhao M; Yang G; Geng X; Hu X; Huang J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(17):22131-22145. PubMed ID: 33411298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short and long-term effects of low-sulphur fuels on marine zooplankton communities.
Jönander C; Dahllöf I
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Oct; 227():105592. PubMed ID: 32891020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Severe Toxic Effects on Pelagic Copepods from Maritime Exhaust Gas Scrubber Effluents.
Thor P; Granberg ME; Winnes H; Magnusson K
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(9):5826-5835. PubMed ID: 33876924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of scrubber water discharges from ships using comprehensive suspect screening strategies based on GC-APCI-HRMS.
García-Gómez E; Gkotsis G; Nika MC; Hassellöv IM; Salo K; Hermansson AL; Ytreberg E; Thomaidis NS; Gros M; Petrović M
Chemosphere; 2023 Dec; 343():140296. PubMed ID: 37769908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toxic effects of ship exhaust gas closed-loop scrubber wash water.
Ji Z; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ling Y; Ren D; Zhang N; Huo Z
Toxicol Ind Health; 2023 Sep; 39(9):491-503. PubMed ID: 37420335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane Separation Used as Treatment of Alkaline Wastewater from a Maritime Scrubber Unit.
Drouin M; Parravicini G; Nasser S; Moulin P
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 36295727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental assessment model for scrubbers versus alternative mitigation systems for feeder vessels in liner shipping.
Martínez-López A; Marrero Á; Martín-Cruz Y; González MM
J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 321():115954. PubMed ID: 35987055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air quality in Canadian port cities after regulation of low-sulphur marine fuel in the North American Emissions Control Area.
Anastasopolos AT; Sofowote UM; Hopke PK; Rouleau M; Shin T; Dheri A; Peng H; Kulka R; Gibson MD; Farah PM; Sundar N
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():147949. PubMed ID: 34119798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the costs and environmental benefits of IMO regulations of ship-originated SOx and NOx emissions in the Baltic Sea.
Repka S; Erkkilä-Välimäki A; Jonson JE; Posch M; Törrönen J; Jalkanen JP
Ambio; 2021 Sep; 50(9):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 33677810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-depth characterization of exhaust particles performed on-board a modern cruise ship applying a scrubber.
Kuittinen N; Timonen H; Karjalainen P; Murtonen T; Vesala H; Bloss M; Honkanen M; Lehtoranta K; Aakko-Saksa P; Rönkkö T
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 946():174052. PubMed ID: 38925377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marine Microbiota Responses to Shipping Scrubber Effluent Assessed at Community Structure and Function Endpoints.
Genitsaris S; Stefanidou N; Hatzinikolaou D; Kourkoutmani P; Michaloudi E; Voutsa D; Gros M; García-Gómez E; Petrović M; Ntziachristos L; Moustaka-Gouni M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2024 May; 43(5):1012-1029. PubMed ID: 38415986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
