These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34592358)
1. Cemented Polished Tapered Stems Have Lower Revision Rates Than Commonly Used Cementless Implant up to 17 Years of Follow-Up: An Analysis of 201,889 Total Hip Replacements From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Babazadeh S; de Steiger RN; Holder C; van Bavel D J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 34592358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems. Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems. Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collared Cementless Femoral Components Reduce the Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study. Rele S; O'Bryan E; Holder C; Lewis PL; Di Bella C J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S340-S346.e2. PubMed ID: 38735543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Registry-based study of survivorship of cemented femoral components versus collared cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty in older patients with osteoarthritis. Orce Rodríguez A; Smith PN; Johnson P; O'Sullivan M; Holder C; Shimmin A Bone Joint J; 2024 Mar; 106-B(3 Supple A):121-129. PubMed ID: 38423086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stainless Steel Femoral Heads Reduce Rate of Revision When Compared to Ion-Implanted Chromium-Cobalt Heads With a Single Cemented Femoral Design: An Analysis of 40,468 Total Hip Replacements From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Babazadeh S; de Steiger RN; Peng Y; van Bavel D J Arthroplasty; 2021 Dec; 36(12):3945-3949. PubMed ID: 34521567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Size for a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Cementless Implant on Component Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 41,265 Stems. Hoskins WT; Bingham RJ; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1074-1078. PubMed ID: 31787355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Rymaszewska M; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ; Reed MR Bone Joint J; 2013 Jun; 95-B(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 23723267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced Revision Rates in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Page RS; Alder-Price AC; Rainbird S; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Peng Y; Holder C; Lorimer MF; Gill SD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1940-1949. PubMed ID: 35901440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of femoral stems with exchangeable necks in primary total hip arthroplasty increases the rate of revision. Graves SE; de Steiger R; Davidson D; Donnelly W; Rainbird S; Lorimer MF; Cashman KS; Vial RJ Bone Joint J; 2017 Jun; 99-B(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 28566395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry. Inacio MC; Lorimer M; Davidson DC; De Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Graves SE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2353-2366. PubMed ID: 30303878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Surgical Approach and Femoral Prosthesis Type on Revision Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the Most Commonly Utilized Cementless Stems. Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Peng Y; Graves SE; Bingham R J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Jan; 104(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 34648474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component? Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision. Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces the Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in Patients 65 Years and Older: An Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry. Kelly M; Chen AF; Ryan SP; Working ZM; Porter KR; De A; Mullen K; Kagan R J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7 Suppl 2):S351-S354. PubMed ID: 37105331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the Role of Stem Size and Offset in the Risk of Nonseptic Revision of the Exeter® 150-mm Stem? A Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. Itayem R; Rolfson O; Mohaddes M; Kärrholm J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 37104550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]