These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34592903)
1. Sucrose detection and discrimination estimated by the analysis of psychometric functions with linear and non-linear models. Chacon-Blanco R; Juarez-Enriquez E; Olivas GI; Jimenez J; Sepulveda DR Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2022 May; 73(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 34592903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers. García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R; Woods RL; Peli E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):829-53. PubMed ID: 21264745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. Nelson DA; Schmitz JL; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Javel E J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2393-414. PubMed ID: 8865646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method. Ulrich R; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint entropy for space and spatial frequency domains estimated from psychometric functions of achromatic discrimination. Silveira Vde A; Souza Gda S; Gomes BD; Rodrigues AR; Silveira LC PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86579. PubMed ID: 24466158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a generalized sweetness sensitivity for an individual? A psychophysical investigation of inter-individual differences in detectability and discriminability for sucrose and fructose. Peng M; Hautus MJ; Oey I; Silcock P Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():239-48. PubMed ID: 27497921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid Throughput Concentration-Response Analysis of Human Taste Discrimination. Palmer RK; Stewart MM; Talley J J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2021 Apr; 377(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 33468642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. Allen P; Wightman F J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 8170124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The single interval adjustment matrix (SIAM) yes-no task: an empirical assessment using auditory and gustatory stimuli. Shepherd D; Hautus MJ; Stocks MA; Quek SY Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1934-47. PubMed ID: 21533962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. LaMotte RH; Mountcastle VB J Neurophysiol; 1975 May; 38(3):539-59. PubMed ID: 1127456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic analysis of discrete reproductive traits in sheep using linear and nonlinear models: II. Goodness of fit and predictive ability. Matos CA; Thomas DL; Gianola D; Perez-Enciso M; Young LD J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 9027552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone is not a taste enhancer in aqueous sucrose solutions. Kroeze JH Chem Senses; 2000 Oct; 25(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 11015327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method. Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noise location and the slope of the psychometric function for simple motion stimuli. Gros BL; Pope DR; Cohn TE J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Mar; 16(3):718-27. PubMed ID: 10069057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data. Miller J; Ulrich R Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]