211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3459325)
1. The influence of sample takers on the cellular composition of cervical smears.
Vooijs GP; Elias A; van der Graaf Y; Poelen-van de Berg M
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 3459325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears.
Vooijs PG; Elias A; van der Graaf Y; Veling S
Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 3859130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.
Elias A; Linthorst G; Bekker B; Vooijs PG
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception.
Vooijs GP; van der Graaf Y; Elias AG
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 3604536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of endocervical status on the cytologic prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1449025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency of endocervical cells in cervical smears and hysterectomy rate of the patients.
Schenck U; Planding W
Gen Diagn Pathol; 1998 Apr; 143(5-6):291-6. PubMed ID: 9653910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
Kivlahan C; Ingram E
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modified endocervical vaginal smear for diagnosis of endocervical microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
Melsheimer P; Hahn U; Herberling D; Wallwiener D; Rummel HH; Bastert G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(11):608-10. PubMed ID: 8533497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears.
Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP; de Haan AF
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 2929223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
Baker RM
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
