These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34593324)
41. Comparison of embryo implantation potential between time-lapse incubators and standard incubators: a randomized controlled study. Zhang XD; Zhang Q; Han W; Liu WW; Shen XL; Yao GD; Shi SL; Hu LL; Wang SS; Wang JX; Zhou JJ; Kang WW; Zhang HD; Luo C; Yu Q; Liu RZ; Sun YP; Sun HX; Wang XH; Quan S; Huang GN Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):858-866. PubMed ID: 36210273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome. Adolfsson E; Andershed AN JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 29912521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Time-lapse videography for embryo selection/de-selection: a bright future or fading star? Liu Y; Sakkas D; Afnan M; Matson P Hum Fertil (Camb); 2020 Jun; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 30963781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. How much have we learned from time-lapse in clinical IVF? Castelló D; Motato Y; Basile N; Remohí J; Espejo-Catena M; Meseguer M Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 22(10):719-727. PubMed ID: 27645282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. VerMilyea M; Hall JMM; Diakiw SM; Johnston A; Nguyen T; Perugini D; Miller A; Picou A; Murphy AP; Perugini M Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 32240301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects of early cleavage patterns of human embryos on subsequent in vitro development and implantation. Mizobe Y; Oya N; Iwakiri R; Yoshida N; Sato Y; Miyoshi K; Tokunaga M; Ezono Y Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):348-353.e2. PubMed ID: 27143517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Dal Canto M; Coticchio G; Mignini Renzini M; De Ponti E; Novara PV; Brambillasca F; Comi R; Fadini R Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 22995750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Which embryo selection method should be offered to the patients? Kovacs P; Lieman HJ J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):603-605. PubMed ID: 30953231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Time lapse (Embryoscope®) as a routine technique in the IVF laboratory: a useful tool for better embryo selection?]. Freour T; Lammers J; Splingart C; Jean M; Barriere P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):476-80. PubMed ID: 22901784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study. Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Delgado A; Minasi MG; Fabozzi G; Gallego RD; Stoppa M; Bellver J; Giancani A; Esbert M; Capalbo A; Remohì J; Greco E; Ubaldi FM; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2019 Dec; 112(6):1080-1093.e1. PubMed ID: 31843084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Spontaneous blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low pregnancy outcome: A Time-Lapse study. Sciorio R; Thong KJ; Pickering SJ JBRA Assist Reprod; 2020 Jan; 24(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 31397550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Zaninovic N; Irani M; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 29101997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Hatching of in vitro fertilized human embryos is influenced by fertilization method. Kirkegaard K; Hindkjaer JJ; Ingerslev HJ Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 23909991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Time-lapse embryo imaging technology: does it improve the clinical results? Findikli N; Oral E Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 26(3):138-44. PubMed ID: 24752001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator. Holschbach V; Weigert J; Dietrich JE; Roesner S; Montag M; Strowitzki T; Toth B Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 May; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 28482910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey. Boueilh T; Reignier A; Barriere P; Freour T J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Dec; 35(12):2181-2186. PubMed ID: 30187427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Randomized study of G-TL and global media for blastocyst culture in the EmbryoScope: morphokinetics, pregnancy, and live births after single-embryo transfer. Desai N; Yao M; Richards EG; Goldberg JM Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 32861442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]