These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34593508)

  • 1. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.
    Skivington K; Matthews L; Simpson SA; Craig P; Baird J; Blazeby JM; Boyd KA; Craig N; French DP; McIntosh E; Petticrew M; Rycroft-Malone J; White M; Moore L
    BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n2061. PubMed ID: 34593508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes Part I: What Makes a Good Outcome Measure?
    Kovach CR
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2019 Nov; 12(6):271-273. PubMed ID: 31755963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.
    Craig P; Cooper C; Gunnell D; Haw S; Lawson K; Macintyre S; Ogilvie D; Petticrew M; Reeves B; Sutton M; Thompson S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Dec; 66(12):1182-6. PubMed ID: 22577181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting guidelines for case reports and new methods standards for missing data.
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24262767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The magic sextet of clinical research.
    Pitta GB; Roque FP; Pitta MR
    Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2009; 24(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 19768287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.
    Moore GF; Audrey S; Barker M; Bond L; Bonell C; Hardeman W; Moore L; O'Cathain A; Tinati T; Wight D; Baird J
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1258. PubMed ID: 25791983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
    Simera I; Moher D; Hoey J; Schulz KF; Altman DG
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 20055895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Process evaluation of complex cardiovascular interventions: How to interpret the results of my trial?
    Saarijärvi M; Wallin L; Bratt EL
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Mar; 19(3):269-274. PubMed ID: 32054300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance.
    Craig P; Petticrew M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 May; 50(5):585-7. PubMed ID: 23159017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating complex interventions.
    Seers K
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 17553106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines on design and statistics for Appetite.
    Geary N; Higgs S
    Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():343-8. PubMed ID: 25888072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the pasta theory of reproductive research.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1373. PubMed ID: 29912341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review.
    Superchi C; González JA; Solà I; Cobo E; Hren D; Boutron I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):48. PubMed ID: 30841850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emphasizing methods in outcomes research.
    Krumholz HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2011 Mar; 4(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 21406667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Medical Research Council and clinical trial methodologies before the 1940s: the failure to develop a 'scientific' approach.
    Bryder L
    J R Soc Med; 2011 Aug; 104(8):335-43. PubMed ID: 21816933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Composite outcome measurement in clinical research: the triumph of illusion over reality?
    McKenna SP; Heaney A
    J Med Econ; 2020 Oct; 23(10):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 32673124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unexpected predictor-outcome associations in clinical prediction research: causes and solutions.
    Schuit E; Groenwold RH; Harrell FE; de Kort WL; Kwee A; Mol BW; Riley RD; Moons KG
    CMAJ; 2013 Jul; 185(10):E499-505. PubMed ID: 23339155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better reporting, better research: guidelines and guidance in PLoS Medicine.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2008 Apr; 5(4):e99. PubMed ID: 18447579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.
    Moher D; Weeks L; Ocampo M; Seely D; Sampson M; Altman DG; Schulz KF; Miller D; Simera I; Grimshaw J; Hoey J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jul; 64(7):718-42. PubMed ID: 21216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 80.