141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34593704)
1. Robotic live donor hysterectomy.
Dahm-Kähler P; Kvarnström N; Brännström M
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2021 Dec; 26(6):640-645. PubMed ID: 34593704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of surgical steps in robotics-assisted donor surgery for uterus transplantation: results of the eight cases in the Swedish trial.
Brännström M; Kvarnström N; Groth K; Akouri R; Wiman L; Enskog A; Dahm-Kähler P
Fertil Steril; 2020 Nov; 114(5):1097-1107. PubMed ID: 32828495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparotomy or minimal invasive surgery in uterus transplantation: a comparison.
Ayoubi JM; Carbonnel M; Pirtea P; Kvarnström N; Brännström M; Dahm-Kähler P
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jul; 112(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 31277761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: Early Outcomes and Complications of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors.
Johannesson L; Koon EC; Bayer J; McKenna GJ; Wall A; Fernandez H; Martinez EJ; Gupta A; Ruiz R; Onaca N; Testa G
Transplantation; 2021 Jan; 105(1):225-230. PubMed ID: 32150040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Live birth after robotic-assisted live donor uterus transplantation.
Brännström M; Dahm-Kähler P; Kvarnström N; Akouri R; Rova K; Olausson M; Groth K; Ekberg J; Enskog A; Sheikhi M; Mölne J; Bokström H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Sep; 99(9):1222-1229. PubMed ID: 32196630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterus transplantation:robotic surgeon perspective.
Fornalik H; Fornalik N
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):365. PubMed ID: 29246556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
Sunkara S; Guan X
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adapting surgical skills from robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer to uterine transplantation: a look to an optimistic future!
Carbonnel M; Dahm-Kähler P; Revaux A; Brännström M; Ayoubi JM
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):841-847. PubMed ID: 32088836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.
Gaia G; Holloway RW; Santoro L; Ahmad S; Di Silverio E; Spinillo A
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 21099613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic Donor Hysterectomy Results in Technical Success and Live Births After Uterus Transplantation: Subanalysis Within the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) Clinical Trial.
Johannesson L; Wall AE; Bayer J; McKenna GJ; Rosenzweig M; DA Graca B; Koon EC; Testa G
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 65(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 35045026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?
Carbonnel M; Moawad GN; Tarazi MM; Revaux A; Kennel T; Favre-Inhofer A; Ayoubi JM
JSLS; 2021; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 33879990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Lowenstein L; Mor O; Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Boulus S; Weiner Z; Baekelandt J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33144242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.
Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
