These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34594165)

  • 1. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.
    Blohmer JU; Beier L; Faridi A; Ankel C; Krause-Bergmann B; Paepke S; Mau C; Keller M; Strittmatter HJ; Karsten MM
    Breast Care (Basel); 2021 Aug; 16(4):335-342. PubMed ID: 34594165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.
    Beier L; Faridi A; Neumann C; Paepke S; Mau C; Keller M; Strittmatter HJ; Gerber-Schäfer C; Bauer L; Karsten MM; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU
    Breast Care (Basel); 2021 Oct; 16(5):461-467. PubMed ID: 34720805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
    BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study.
    Brunbjerg ME; Jensen TB; Overgaard J; Christiansen P; Damsgaard TE
    Gland Surg; 2021 Jan; 10(1):207-218. PubMed ID: 33633977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction Obviates the Use of Aceullular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.
    Rivet JJ; Day KM; Rau JF; Waldrop JL; Brzezienski MA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S394-S398. PubMed ID: 30694845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
    Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.
    Lynch MP; Chung MT; Rinker BD
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74 Suppl 4():S214-7. PubMed ID: 25389715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Forsberg CG; Kelly DA; Wood BC; Mastrangelo SL; DeFranzo AJ; Thompson JT; David LR; Marks MW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S116-20. PubMed ID: 24374398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
    DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Wilschut JA; Mullender MG; Salzberg CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Feb; 6(2):e1654. PubMed ID: 29616167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?
    Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Schrenk P; Bjelic-Radisic V; Unterrieder K; Leser C; Fink-Retter A; Salama M; Singer C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 26947961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.
    Kelley RS; Duraes EFR; Scomacao IR; Van Dijck P; Fahradyan V; Rambhia S; Moreira AA; Djohan RS; Schwarz GS; Bernard SL
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4117-4124. PubMed ID: 36117132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Hong SE; Kim JH
    Gland Surg; 2021 Jan; 10(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 33633966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.