These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34595185)

  • 1. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics in Post-SMILE, Post-LASEK, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Shang J; Shen Y; Jhanji V; Zhou X; Zhao J; Zhao Y; Zhou X
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():695697. PubMed ID: 34595185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of corneal biomechanical changes after small incision lenticule extraction with Pentacam and Corvis ST].
    Zhang MY; Zhang FJ; Song YZ; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Yang WL; Zhai CB
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 32074820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the posterior corneal elevation and biomechanics after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short- and long-term observation.
    Yu M; Chen M; Dai J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 257(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 30643965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis.
    Chen M; Yu M; Dai J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 94(7):e586-e591. PubMed ID: 27130377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics Treated With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction by New Corneal Biomechanical Parameters of Corvis ST II.
    Liu M; Li N; Chen T; Tian G; Lin Y; Gao H; Shi W
    Cornea; 2023 Nov; 42(11):1384-1390. PubMed ID: 36729642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study on corneal biomechanical properties of suspicious keratoconus patients in corneal topography].
    Zhang YH; Wang Y; Li LY; Zhang L; Wei PH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 55(6):442-447. PubMed ID: 31189274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients.
    He S; Luo Y; Ye Y; Chen P; Liu C; Lei L; Zhuang J; Yu K
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jul; 10(13):730. PubMed ID: 35957728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual outcomes after three different surgical procedures for correction of refractive error in patients with thin corneas.
    Hwang HS; Lee HJ; Lee SJ; Kim JH
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(6):970-977. PubMed ID: 32566511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics After Surface Ablation Refractive Surgery and Novel Lamellar Refractive Surgery.
    Dou R; Wang Y; Xu L; Wu D; Wu W; Li X
    Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1441-6. PubMed ID: 26226471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE.
    Zhang D; Tian L; Zhang H; Zheng Y; Fu C; Zhai C; Jie Y; Li L
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():861924. PubMed ID: 35646859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship Among Corneal Stiffness, Thickness, and Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in Keratoconus.
    Zhao Y; Shen Y; Yan Z; Tian M; Zhao J; Zhou X
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():740. PubMed ID: 31263429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study.
    Yu M; Chen M; Liu W; Dai J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 30894159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).
    Sefat SM; Wiltfang R; Bechmann M; Mayer WJ; Kampik A; Kook D
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26554611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes.
    Li Y; Xu Z; Liu Q; Wang Y; Lin K; Xia J; Chen S; Hu L
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Jan; 8(1):2. PubMed ID: 33419485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
    Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Outcomes After SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK Combined With Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for High Myopic Correction.
    Hyun S; Lee S; Kim JH
    Cornea; 2017 Apr; 36(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 27893524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.
    Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).
    Cao K; Liu L; Yu T; Chen F; Bai J; Liu T
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Apr; 35(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 31463819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Guo H; Hosseini-Moghaddam SM; Hodge W
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):167. PubMed ID: 31370817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.