These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34596244)

  • 1. Development of an instrument for assessing the quality of forensic evidence and expert testimony from three feature-comparison methods: DNA, voice, and fingerprint analysis.
    Villavicencio-Queijeiro A; Loyzance C; García-Castillo Z; Suzuri-Hernández J; Castillo-Alanís A; López-Olvera P; López-Escobedo F
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):217-228. PubMed ID: 34596244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latent justice? A review of adversarial challenges to fingerprint evidence.
    Edmond G
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 35033325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination--a brief look at the present state of play in the forensic arena.
    Broeders AP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):148-57. PubMed ID: 16226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence.
    Garrett BL; Crozier WE; Grady R
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1199-1209. PubMed ID: 32320075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In search of a free movement of forensic evidence: Towards minimum standards to determine evidence admissibility?
    Depauw S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102021. PubMed ID: 32769042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reconstruction: a useful tool in forensic sciences.
    Brandt-Casadevall C; Krompecher T; Mangin P
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jan; 41(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 11219131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Kocsis RN; Palermo GB
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2020 Sep; 64(12):1317-1340. PubMed ID: 32189536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judges and forensic science education: A national survey.
    Garrett BL; Gardner BO; Murphy E; Grimes P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110714. PubMed ID: 33592556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of forensic evidence in the investigation of volume crime scenes.
    Wüllenweber S; Giles S
    Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):542-554. PubMed ID: 34482934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cooperation between law enforcement officers and forensic specialists. Diagnosis and possible improvements - a Lithuanian experience.
    Malewski H; Kurapka VE; Matulienė S; Navickienė Ž
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2016; 66(3):182-210. PubMed ID: 28453171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Basu N; Bali AS; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Dec; 341():111499. PubMed ID: 36283276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of specialized forensic knowledge when conducting investigative actions and appointing the transport and technical forensic examinations].
    Ilyin NN
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2020; 63(4):4-8. PubMed ID: 32686382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
    Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.