These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34596361)

  • 21. Cranial symmetry in baleen whales (Cetacea, Mysticeti) and the occurrence of cranial asymmetry throughout cetacean evolution.
    Fahlke JM; Hampe O
    Naturwissenschaften; 2015 Oct; 102(9-10):58. PubMed ID: 26336812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The application of traditional and geometric morphometric analyses for forensic quantification of sexual dimorphism: preliminary investigations in a Western Australian population.
    Franklin D; Cardini A; Flavel A; Kuliukas A
    Int J Legal Med; 2012 Jul; 126(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 22399102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].
    Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 27109917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Average African American three-dimensional computed tomography skull images: the potential clinical importance of ethnicity and sex.
    Dean D; Bookstein FL; Koneru S; Lee JH; Kamath J; Cutting CB; Hans M; Goldberg J
    J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Jul; 9(4):348-58; discussion 359. PubMed ID: 9780930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium.
    Toneva DH; Nikolova SY; Tasheva-Terzieva ED; Zlatareva DK; Lazarov NE
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Nov; 136(6):1851-1863. PubMed ID: 35945460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Getting a head in hard soils: Convergent skull evolution and divergent allometric patterns explain shape variation in a highly diverse genus of pocket gophers (Thomomys).
    Marcy AE; Hadly EA; Sherratt E; Garland K; Weisbecker V
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):207. PubMed ID: 27724858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing different 3D techniques using geometric morphometrics: Implications for cranial fluctuating asymmetry in humans.
    Olsen TB; García-Martínez D; Villa C
    Am J Biol Anthropol; 2023 Jan; 180(1):224-234. PubMed ID: 36790697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliable classification of intentional cranial vault modification and nonsynostotic deformational plagiocephaly using 3D geometric morphometrics.
    Black VG; Kurin DS
    Homo; 2021 Jun; 72(2):99-1111. PubMed ID: 33656511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Geometric morphometric study of population variation in indigenous southern African crania.
    Franklin D; Freedman L; Milne N; Oxnard CE
    Am J Hum Biol; 2007; 19(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 17160981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New insights into the phenotypic covariance structure of the anthropoid cranium.
    Makedonska J
    J Anat; 2014 Dec; 225(6):634-58. PubMed ID: 25406861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Geometric morphometrics on juvenile crania: Exploring age and sex variation in an Australian population.
    Noble J; Cardini A; Flavel A; Franklin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():57-68. PubMed ID: 30453177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
    Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
    Zhang Y; Schepartz LA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245445. PubMed ID: 33444349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: a simplified protocol for beginners.
    Viscosi V; Cardini A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25630. PubMed ID: 21991324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics on MRI images: An example of inter-operator bias in 3D landmarks and its impact on big datasets.
    Daboul A; Ivanovska T; Bülow R; Biffar R; Cardini A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197675. PubMed ID: 29787586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of nasal bone and aperture shape among three South African populations.
    McDowell JL; Kenyhercz MW; L'Abbé EN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():189.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25963274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do we need the third dimension? Quantifying the effect of the z-axis in 3D geometric morphometrics based on sailfin silversides (Telmatherinidae).
    Wasiljew BD; Pfaender J; Wipfler B; Utama IV; Herder F
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):537-545. PubMed ID: 32447773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can skull form predict the shape of the temporomandibular joint? A study using geometric morphometrics on the skulls of wolves and domestic dogs.
    Curth S; Fischer MS; Kupczik K
    Ann Anat; 2017 Nov; 214():53-62. PubMed ID: 28865771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of craniofacial form.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Anthropol Anz; 2016; 73(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 27490899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.