BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34597232)

  • 1. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
    Grigovich M; Kacharia VS; Bharwani N; Hemingway A; Mijatovic V; Rodgers SK
    Radiographics; 2021 Oct; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency.
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Luciano AA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 24910933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D; van Eekelen R; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Rijswijk J; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 38600625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiologic versus ultrasound fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast-ultrasonography with echovist 200].
    Korell M; Seehaus D; Strowitzki T; Hepp H
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9173524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution.
    Boudghène FP; Bazot M; Robert Y; Perrot N; Rocourt N; Antoine JM; Morris H; Leroy JL; Uzan S; Bigot JM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH; van Vliet M; Weber M; Exalto N
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup.
    Exalto N; Emanuel MH
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4827376. PubMed ID: 31360713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).
    De Neubourg D; Janssens L; Verhaegen I; Smits E; Mol BW; Roelant E
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e054845. PubMed ID: 34845077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined Real-Time Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography with B Mode Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in the Evaluation of Fallopian Tube Patency in Patients Undergoing Infertility Investigations.
    Chen S; Du X; Chen Q; Chen S
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9408141. PubMed ID: 31275995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
    J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Fallopian Tube Fimbria Patency With 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in Infertile Women.
    Wang W; Zhou Q; Gong Y; Li Y; Huang Y; Chen Z
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2061-2069. PubMed ID: 28543598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL; Jung JJ; Yu SL; Rajesh H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with SH U 454 (Echovist) for the assessment of tubal patency.
    Reis MM; Soares SR; Cancado ML; Camargos AF
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3049-52. PubMed ID: 9853854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.