158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34598057)
1. Testosterone and cortisol do not predict rejecting harm or maximizing outcomes in sacrificial moral dilemmas: A preregistered analysis.
Reynolds CJ; Makhanova A; Nikonova L; Eckel LA; Conway P
Horm Behav; 2021 Nov; 136():105063. PubMed ID: 34598057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
Byrd N; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions.
Goldstein-Greenwood J; Conway P; Summerville A; Johnson BN
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1303-1317. PubMed ID: 31989859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
Reynolds CJ; Conway P
Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Drunk Utilitarian Revisited: Does Alcohol Really Increase Utilitarianism in Moral Judgment?
Paruzel-Czachura M; Pypno K; Everett JAC; Białek M; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jan; 49(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 34657500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Switching Tracks? Towards a Multidimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology.
Everett JAC; Kahane G
Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 Feb; 24(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 31911126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are people really less moral in their foreign language? Proficiency and comprehension matter for the moral foreign language effect in Russian speakers.
Kirova A; Tang Y; Conway P
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287789. PubMed ID: 37428758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
Kahane G; Everett JA; Earp BD; Farias M; Savulescu J
Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():193-209. PubMed ID: 25460392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deontologists are not always trusted over utilitarians: revisiting inferences of trustworthiness from moral judgments.
Bostyn DH; Chandrashekar SP; Roets A
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1665. PubMed ID: 36717679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who is deontological? Completing moral dilemmas in front of mirrors increases deontological but not utilitarian response tendencies.
Reynolds CJ; Knighten KR; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103993. PubMed ID: 31229738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contextualizing sacrificial dilemmas within Covid-19 for the study of moral judgment.
Carron R; Blanc N; Brigaud E
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273521. PubMed ID: 35994508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies.
Muda R; Niszczota P; Białek M; Conway P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 28758777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deontological Dilemma Response Tendencies and Sensorimotor Representations of Harm to Others.
Christov-Moore L; Conway P; Iacoboni M
Front Integr Neurosci; 2017; 11():34. PubMed ID: 29311859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.
van Honk J; Terburg D; Montoya ER; Grafman J; Stein DJ; Morgan B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2119072119. PubMed ID: 35878039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
